[council] Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Recommendations for ICANN Board Consideration - call for comments
Glen de Saint Géry
Glen at icann.org
Tue Aug 16 14:14:04 UTC 2011
Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Recommendations for ICANN Board Consideration
Comment Period Deadlines (*)
Important Information Links
Public Comment Box<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/pednr-board-recommendations-15aug11-en.htm>
15 August 2011
To Submit Your Comments (Forum)<mailto:pednr-board-recommendations at icann.org>
15 September 2011
View Comments Submitted<http://forum.icann.org/lists/pednr-board-recommendations/>
Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose
The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) approved<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201107> at its meeting on 21 July 2011 the recommendations on the Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Policy Development Process (PDP). The resolution, which is pending for Board action, proposes:
* Define 'Registered Name Holder at Expiration' (RNHaE) as the entity or individual that was eligible to renew the domain name registration immediately prior to expiration. If the domain name registration was modified pursuant to a term of the Registration Agreement authorizing the modification of registration data for the purposes of facilitating renewal but not at the explicit request of the registrant, the RNHaE is the entity or individual identified as the registrant immediately prior to that modification.
* For at least 8 consecutive days, at some point following expiration, the original DNS resolution path specified by the RNHaE, at the time of expiration, must be interrupted1 by the registrar, to the extent that the registry permits such interruptions 1, and the domain must be renewable by the RNHaE until the end of that period. This 8-day period may occur at any time following expiration. At any time during the 8 day period, the Registered Name Holder at Expiration may renew the domain with the Registrar and the Registrar, within a commercially reasonable delay, will restore the domain name to resolve to its original DNS resolution path prior to expiration. Notwithstanding, the Registrar may delete the domain at any time during the Autorenew grace period.
* If at any time after expiration when the Registered Name is still renewable by the RNHaE, the Registrar changes the DNS resolution path to effect a different landing website than the one used by the RNHaE prior to expiration, the page shown must explicitly say that the domain has expired and give instructions on how to recover the domain. Wording in the policy must make clear that ¡°instructions¡± may be as simple as directing the RNHaE to a specific web site.
* The RNHaE cannot be prevented from renewing a domain name registration as a result of WHOIS changes made by the Registrar that were not at the RNHaE.s request.
* The registration agreement must include or point to any fee(s) charged for the post expiration renewal of a domain name. If the Registrar operates a website for registration or renewal, it should state, both at the time of registration and in a clear place on its website, any fee(s) charged for the post-expiration renewal of a domain name or the recovery of a domain name during the Redemption Grace Period.
* The registration agreement and Registrar web site (if one is used) must clearly indicate what methods will be used to deliver pre- and post-expiration notifications, or must point to the location where such information can be found. What destination address/number will be used must also be specified, if applicable.
* Registrar must notify Registered Name Holder of impending expiration no less than two times. One such notice must be sent one month or 30 days prior to expiration (+/- 4 days) and one must be sent one week prior to expiration (+/- 3 days). If more that two alert notifications are sent, the timing of two of them must be comparable to the timings specified.
* Unless the Registered Name is renewed or deleted by the Registrar, at least one notification to the RNHaE, which includes renewal instructions, must be sent after expiration.
* Notifications of impending expiration must include method(s) that do not require explicit registrant action other than standard e-mail receipt in order to receive such notifications.
* With the exception of sponsored gTLDs, all gTLD Registries shall offer the Redemption Grace Period (RGP). For currently existing unsponsored gTLDs that do not currently offer the RGP, a transition period shall be allowed. All new gTLDs must offer the RGP. As part of the implementation, ICANN Staff should consider the Technical Steering Group's Implementation Proposal (see http://www.icann.org/en/meetings/bucharest/redemption-topic.htm)
* If a Registrar offers registrations in a gTLD that supports the RGP, the Registrar must allow the Registered Name Holder at Expiration to redeem the Registered Name after it has entered RGP.
* A transfer of a domain name during the RGP should not be allowed.
* In the event that ICANN gives reasonable notice to Registrars that ICANN has published web content as described in PEDNR Recommendation #16:
* Registrars, who have a web presence, must provide a link to the ICANN content on any website it may operate for domain name registration or renewal clearly displayed to its Registered Name Holders at least as clearly as its links to policies or notifications required to be displayed under ICANN Consensus Policies.
* Registrars may also host similar material adapted to their specific practices and processes.
* Registrar must point to the ICANN material in a communication sent to the registrant immediately following initial registration as well as in the mandated annual WHOIS reminder.
Note: Some of these recommendations may need special consideration in the context of existing provisions in the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), the proposed Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) or exceptions due to fraud, breach of registration agreement or other substantive reasons and the GNSO Council, therefore, recommends that such considerations are taken into account as part of the implementation of these recommendations, once adopted.
* The GNSO Council recommends the following best practices for promotion by ICANN and the Registrar Stakeholder Group:
* If post-expiration notifications are normally sent to a point of contact using the domain in question, and delivery is known to have been interrupted by post-expiration actions, post-expiration notifications should be sent to some other contact point associated with the registrant if one exists.
* The notification method explanation should include the registrar's email address from which notification messages are sent and a suggestion that registrants save this email address as a 'safe sender' to avoid notification emails being blocked by spam filter software.
* Registrars should advise registrants to provide a secondary email point of contact that is not associated with the domain name itself so that in case of expiration reminders can be delivered to this secondary email point of contact.
* The GNSO Council recommends that ICANN, in consultation with Registrars, ALAC and other interested parties, will develop educational materials about how to properly steward a domain name and how to prevent unintended loss. Such material may include registrant responsibilities and the gTLD domain life-cycle and guidelines for keeping domain name records current. (PEDNR Recommendation #16).
* ICANN Compliance is requested to provide updates to the GNSO Council on a regular basis in relation to the implementation and effectiveness of the proposed recommendations, either in the form of a report that details amongst others the number of complaints received in relation to renewal and/or post-expiration related matters or in the form of audits that assess if the policy has been implemented as intended.
* The GNSO Council shall convene a PEDNR Implementation Review Team to assist ICANN Staff in developing the implementation details for the new policy should it be approved by the ICANN Board. The Implementation Review Team will be tasked with evaluating the proposed implementation of the policy recommendations as approved by the Board and is expected to work with ICANN Staff to ensure that the resultant implementation meets the letter and intent of the approved policy. If the PEDNR Implementation Review Team identifies any potential modifications to the policy or new PEDNR policy recommendations, the PEDNR Implementation Review Team shall refer these to the GNSO Council for its consideration and follow-up, as appropriate. Following adoption by the ICANN Board of the recommendations, the GNSO Secretariat is authorized to issue a call for volunteers for a PEDNR Implementation Review Team to the members of the PEDNR Working Group.
You are invited to submit your comments on these recommendations until 15 September before final consideration by the ICANN Board.
Section II: Background
At the ICANN Meeting in Cairo in November 2008, the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), voted to request an Issues Report on the subject of registrants being able to recover domain names after their formal expiration date. The ALAC request was submitted to ICANN policy staff and the GNSO Council on 20 November 2008. The Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/post-expiration-recovery/report-05dec08.pdf> [PDF, 422 KB] was submitted to the GNSO Council on 5 December 2008. The GNSO Council initiated a PDP<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#200905> on 7 May 2009 and tasked a Working Group to answer the following charter questions:
* Whether adequate opportunity exists for registrants to redeem their expired domain names;
* Whether expiration-related provisions in typical registration agreements are clear and conspicuous enough;
* Whether adequate notice exists to alert registrants of upcoming expirations;
* Whether additional measures need to be implemented to indicate that once a domain name enters the Auto-Renew Grace Period, it has expired (e.g., hold status, a notice on the site with a link to information on how to renew, or other options to be determined);
* Whether to allow the transfer of a domain name during the RGP.
The Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) PDP Working Group started its deliberations in July 2009. The WG published an Initial Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr/pednr-initial-report-31may10-en.pdf> [PDF, 1.02 MB], a Proposed Final Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr/pednr-proposed-final-report-21feb11-en.pdf> [PDF, 972 KB] and submitted its Final Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr-final-report-14jun11-en.pdf> [PDF, 999 KB] to the GNSO Council on 14 June 2011. The GNSO Council unanimously approved all the recommendations contained in the Final Report at its meeting on 21 July 2011.
Section III: Document and Resource Links
* GNSO Council Resolution on the Adoption of the PEDNR Final Report and Recommendations<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201107>
* PEDNR Final Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr-final-report-14jun11-en.pdf> [PDF, 998 KB]
* PEDNR PDP Proposed Final Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr/pednr-proposed-final-report-21feb11-en.pdf> [PDF, 972 KB]
* PEDNR PDP Initial Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr/pednr-initial-report-31may10-en.pdf> [PDF, 1.02 MB]
Section IV: Additional Information
policy.staff at icann.org<mailto:policy.staff at icann.org?subject=More%20information%20on%20the%20Post-Expiration%20Domain%20Name%20Recovery%20Recommendations%20for%20ICANN%20Board%20Consideration%20public%20comment%20period>
Glen de Saint Géry
gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the council