[council] Transition of existing PDPs to new GNSO PDP
Stéphane Van Gelder
stephane.vangelder at indom.com
Mon Dec 19 17:02:05 UTC 2011
Councillors, is there any objection to us instructing each team to transition at the next logical step proposed by Marika?
Le 19 déc. 2011 à 11:48, Marika Konings a écrit :
> Dear All,
> As discussed on the Council meeting last week, please find below an overview of the different Policy Development Processes ongoing and the logical next step in their transition to the new PDP. As a reference, you'll also find attached the overview presented during the meeting which provides further details on each of these next steps. If you have any questions, please let me know.
> With best regards,
> Ongoing GNSO PDPs
> Issue Report on the current state of all rights protection mechanisms implemented for both existing and new gTLDs, including but not limited to, the UDRP and URS (to be delivered no later than eighteen (18) months following the delegation of the first new gTLD) - Development of Preliminary Issue Report
> Uniformity of Contracts – Publication of Preliminary Issue Report for public comment
> Law Enforcement Recommendations (currently on hold) - Publication of Preliminary issue Report for public comment
> 'Thick' Whois – Delivery of Final Issue Report to the GNSO Council following the closing of the public comment period
> RAA – Delivery of Final Issue Report to the GNSO Council following the closing of the public comment period
> UDRP (The Requirement to lock a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings) - Formation of a group to draft the charter for the PDP Working Group. The Council should indicate the timeframe within which a draft PDP Charter is expected to be presented to the GNSO Council for approval.
> IRTP Part C – Development of Initial Report, including the elements outlined in the PDP Manual
> <PDP Comparison - 14 December 2011.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the council