[council] amendments to original JAS motion

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Adrian,

always happy to amuse you and let you enjoying reading motions ... but you
should check more carefully next time, you will find the rationale was to
correct a typo ;)

Rafik



2011/1/7 Adrian Kinderis <adrian at ausregistry.com.au>

> h) is interesting Rafik.
>
>
>
> *Adrian Kinderis*
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 January 2011 7:44 AM
> *To:* Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry
> *Subject:* [council] amendments to original JAS motion
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the
> original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill:
>
>
>
> I would like propose changing:
>
> a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of
> demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a
> method of demonstrating that need."
>
> b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would
> need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms,
> e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set "
>
>
>
> c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to
> support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in
> objective (a) of this charter amendment.
>
> d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of
> coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g.
> brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the
> relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance.
>
> e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods
>
> f) change "Establish methods" to  "Propose methods"
>
> g) change "establish policies and practices"  to "propose policies and
> practices"
>
> h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants
> meeting the requirements for assistance."
>
> with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants
> meeting the requirements for assistance."
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Rafik Dammak
>
> Twitter: @rafik
>
> Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110107/067bd229/attachment.html>