[council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment

[tim at godaddy.com]

I accept as friendly.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>
Sender: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:20:33 
To: Adrian Kinderis<adrian at ausregistry.com.au>
Cc: GNSO Council List<council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment

Thanks Adrian.

Tim, Jonathan, how say you?

Stéphane



Le 21 juin 2011 à 12:17, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :

> Further to my email below I’d like to suggest the following amendment;
>  
> Proposed amendment:
>  
> Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause:
>  
> Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.
>  
>  
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
>  
>  
> From: Adrian Kinderis 
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
>  
> All,
>  
> Much to Glen’s displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to the IRTP-B Motion.
>  
> The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a common position on the complete motion.
>  
> I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head’s up.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110621/72ba7718/attachment.html>