[council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"

Stéphane Van Gelder stephane.vangelder at indom.com
Wed Jun 22 09:13:20 UTC 2011

This is clearly something we can discuss tomorrow.

As usual, we have not set an official agenda for our wrap-up so that we can look forward to some great discussion.



Le 22 juin 2011 à 11:05, <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu> a écrit :

> Unfortunately, that brings us back to the discussion we had after whatever meeting it was, when we ended up re-drafting motions during our public meeting, and that didn't go down well either - both seem opposite ends of the spectrum (too much open discussion versus too little?). Maybe we should discuss this during the wrap-up session tomorrow.
> Cheers
> Mary
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> >>>
> From:	"Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us>
> To:	"'tim at godaddy.com'" <tim at godaddy.com>, "'adrian at ausregistry.com.au'" <adrian at ausregistry.com.au>
> CC:	"'council at gnso.icann.org'" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Date:	6/22/2011 4:59 AM
> Subject:	Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> I think both Mikey and subsequently jumped the gun based on the debates over the weekend, which were just that....debates.
> To post an article like Kieren has could have the unintended affect of stifling open debate during our sessions. I for one prefer open debate, but not if some are going to take that out of context.
> We eventually got to the right place, but we needed to get there through debate and working through the issues. We should have been given the benefit of the doubt until we took final action.
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman at neustar.biz
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim at godaddy.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 04:46 AM
> To: adrian at ausregistry.com.au <adrian at ausregistry.com.au>
> Cc: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> Of course, it is a one sided story. The Council changed nothing in the
> report or recommendations. It only changed it's own motion. But, we all
> know that. Too bad Kieren didn't bother to get more facts before jumping
> the gun with his article. He used to be a bit more careful.
> Tim
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> > From: Adrian Kinderis 
> > Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 2:54 am
> > To: GNSO Council List 
> > 
> > http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model
> > 
> > Adrian Kinderis
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110622/752951fb/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list