[council] Fwd: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

[Stéphane Van Gelder]

FYI

Stéphane



Début du message réexpédié :

> De : Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au>
> Date : 13 mars 2011 23:38:06 HNEC
> À : Van Gelder Stéphane <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>
> Objet : Réexp : [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
> 
> Stephane,
> 
> From our side;
> 
>> What is the GNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct ccNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
>> 
>> - Does the GNSO see value in meeting with the ccNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?
>> 
>> - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the GNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris Disspain
> CEO - auDA
> Sent from my phone
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder at indom.com] 
>> Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26
>> To: Chris Disspain
>> Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Chris,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.
>> 
>> - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
>> 
>> - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?
>> 
>> - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?
>> 
>> - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________
>> 
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>> 
>> http://www.eset.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5950 (20110313) __________
>> 
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>> 
>> http://www.eset.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110314/07526d08/attachment.html>