[council] Draft message to the Board

Stéphane Van Gelder stephane.vangelder at indom.com
Wed May 11 08:34:25 UTC 2011


Sure Olga. That sentence meant that at the time of writing, all the comments received were in support.

Hope that helps.

Stéphane



Le 11 mai 2011 à 00:08, Olga Cavalli a écrit :

> Hi Stéphane,
> my apologies if I missed some emails, I was travelling.
> Could you please clarify "unanimous support"?
> Many thanks and regards
> Olga
> 
> 2011/5/10 Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>
> Councillors,
> 
> In response to Adrian's suggestion, which so far has met with unanimous support, I have drafted this short email to the Board. Please let me have your thoughts and any suggested edits. Rafik, as JAS WG co-chair and Council liaison, I think it is crucial that we have your input before sending any message to the Board.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Peter,
> 
> On May 10, the Board was sent the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group ( JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report by ALAC. We understand that this report has not yet been approved by ALAC.
> 
> The GNSO Council wishes to highlight the fact that it has not approved this report yet either. In fact, the Council has only just received it. The report was sent to us by the co-chairs of the JAS working group on May 9, 2011.
> 
> As one of the two chartering organisations of the JAS WG, the GNSO is keen to ensure that the Board understands the nature of the report that it has been sent, and the circumstances under which it received it.
> 
> I would be grateful therefore, if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> GNSO Council Chair
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110511/c1c05c05/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list