[council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report

HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org
Thu May 19 13:13:17 UTC 2011


I vote for A
Debbie
 
 
Debra Y. Hughes l Senior Counsel
American Red Cross
Office of the General Counsel 
2025 E Street, NW 
Washington, D.C. 20006 
Phone: (202) 303-5356 
Fax: (202) 303-0143
HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org
<mailto:HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org>  

________________________________

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org on behalf of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Thu 5/19/2011 8:31 AM
To: Wendy Seltzer
Cc: council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report


Hi,
+ 1 for A
best
Olga


2011/5/19 Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>



	I vote for A.
	
	--Wendy 


	On 05/18/2011 11:16 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
	

		and another one.
		
		K
		
		________________________________
		From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of john at crediblecontext.com
		Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 1:22 PM
		To: stephane.vangelder at indom.com
		Cc: tim at godaddy.com; owner-council at gnso.icann.org; council at gnso.icann.org; Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us
		Subject: RE: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
		
		One more vote for B
		
		Berard
		
		

			-------- Original Message --------
			Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant
			Support Second Milestone Report
			From: Stéphane Van Gelder
			Date: Tue, May 17, 2011 9:23 am
			To: "Neuman, Jeff"
			Cc: "'tim at godaddy.com'" ,
			"'owner-council at gnso.icann.org'" ,
			"'council at gnso.icann.org'"
			
			So that's one vote for version B, right?
			
			Stéphane
			
			
			
			
			
			Le 17 mai 2011 à 17:54, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
			
			Unfortunately, I cannot commit on behalf of the rysg to that last sentence on "observance" and would prefer its deletion since on our last rysg call questions were raised and I am not sure it adds to the substance of the note.
			
			Thanks.
			
			Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
			
			Vice President, Law&  Policy
			
			NeuStar, Inc.
			
			Jeff.Neuman at neustar.biz
			
			
			
			
			
			
			From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder at indom.com]
			
			Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:43 AM
			To: tim at godaddy.com
			
			Cc: owner-council at gnso.icann.org ; Council GNSO
			
			Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
			
			
			
			Thanks Tim, Jeff, Mary and Alan,
			
			This would be the proposed message then. Either (I call this version A):
			
			Dear Peter,
			
			
			We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as soon as possible.
			
			The GNSO Council would also like to inform the Board that it appreciates the JAS WG's scrupulous observance of the GNSO-chartering process, in submitting its Report simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO for review.
			
			I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.
			
			
			
			Best regards,
			Stephane van Gelder
			GNSO Council Chair
			
			
			Or (this my version B):
			
			
			Dear Peter,
			
			
			We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as soon as possible.
			
			
			I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.
			
			
			
			Best regards,
			Stephane van Gelder
			GNSO Council Chair
			
			
			
			As Olga had requested a vote, I would like to suggest that we give ourselves until Thursday's meeting to vote by return email to the list on either version A or B, and whichever has the most votes is the one I send.
			
			
			Is that acceptable to everyone?
			
			
			Thanks,
			
			
			Stéphane
			
			
			
			
			
			
			Le 17 mai 2011 à 14:12, tim at godaddy.com a écrit :
			No objection if you remove the last sentence. There is no chartering process for CWGs. The ALAC and GNSO could not even agree on what the charter should be. And at least a few of us have concerns about how and why CWGs are being formed.
			
			
			Tim
			From: Stéphane Van Gelder
			
			Sender: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
			
			Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:45:21 +0200
			To: Council GNSO
			Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
			
			Councillors,
			
			Please find below the NCSG's suggestion on a message which I could send to the Chairman of the Board in my capacity as Chair of the GNSO.
			
			Thanks Mary for providing this draft.
			
			Please let me have your comments.
			
			Stéphane
			
			
			
			
			
			Le 14 mai 2011 à 16:31, a écrit :
			
			Hi - sorry for the delay in getting back to you on the Council letter; there has been some lively discussion among some NCSG folks about it.
			
			We suggest the following draft:
			
			Dear Peter,
			
			
			We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as soon as possible.
			
			The GNSO Council would also like to inform the Board that it appreciates the JAS WG's scrupulous observance of the chartering process, in submitting its Report simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO for review.
			
			I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.
			
			
			
			Best regards,
			Stephane van Gelder
			
			Cheers
			Mary
			
			
			
			
			Mary W S Wong
			Professor of Law
			Chair, Graduate IP Programs
			Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
			UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
			Two White Street
			Concord, NH 03301
			USA
			Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
			Phone: 1-603-513-5143
			Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
			Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>>
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			From:
			Stéphane Van Gelder
			
			To:
			Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond , Council GNSO
			
			Date:
			5/14/2011 5:18 AM
			
			Subject:
			[council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone ReportThanks Olivier.
			
			
			GNSO Council, FYI.
			
			
			A good weekend to all.
			
			
			Stéphane
			
			
			
			
			Le 14 mai 2011 à 11:03, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond a écrit :
			
			
			Dear Stéphane,
			
			please find enclosed, a copy of our follow-up message to the Board including ALAC comments.
			Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any query about its contents.
			Have a good week-end!
			Kind regards,
			
			Olivier
			
			-------- Message original --------
			
			
			
			Sujet:
			Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
			
			Date :
			Fri, 13 May 2011 20:26:34 -0700
			
			De :
			ICANN At-Large Staff
			
			Pour :
			Secretary
			
			Copie à :
			ocl at gih.com , carlton.samuels at gmail.com , rafik.dammak at gmail.com , ICANN At-Large Staff
			
			Dear all,
			
			
			The At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to you, on behalf of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC):
			
			The Second Milestone Report of the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group ( JAS WG), with a revised ALAC introduction (entitled ?Status of this Document?); and
			The Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report.
			
			We request that these documents (attached here) be forwarded to the members of the ICANN Board.
			
			The Second Milestone Report was received by the ALAC and the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) on 7 May 2011.  Then, the At-Large staff, on behalf of the ALAC, initially forwarded this Report to the Board on 9 May 2011.  Please note that the Report itself has not been substantively changed since the Board initially received it on 9 May.
			
			During the period 7?13 May, comments on the Report were collected from the At-Large Community.  These comments are the basis for the Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report attached here.
			
			The ALAC ratification process for the Second Milestone Report and the ALAC Statement will begin on 14 May, and the results will be forwarded to the Board.
			
			Please note that GNSO approval of this document is being conducted independently and has not reached the approval stage.
			
			Regards,
			
			Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber-White, and Marilyn Vernon
			ICANN At-Large Staff
			
			email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org <http://atlarge.icann.org/> 
			website: www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> 
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			



	-- 
	Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 914-374-0613
	Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
	Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
	http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
	https://www.chillingeffects.org/
	https://www.torproject.org/
	http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
	
	
	






More information about the council mailing list