AW: [council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report

[William Drake]

Hi Wolf-Ulrich

On May 23, 2011, at 2:03 PM, <KnobenW at telekom.de> <KnobenW at telekom.de> wrote:

> could you please provide me with the "false information circulated"? Sorry, I forget too many things.

I believe we discussed previously the fact that there were people running around saying that JAS had directly submitted its report to the Board in some sort of dastardly plot to circumvent the GNSO Council.  These rumblings were then put into words on a widely read blog http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110512_icann_tiptoes_through_political_minefield_new_tlds/ which prompted Alan and other JAS members to issue corrections.  I don't know whether those corrections have been widely read and internalized or if there are still people out there laboring under misunderstandings.  But I would think the Council would have a self-interest in stating for the record that the process was followed and it was not dissed.

Best,

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110523/1738c1a6/attachment.html>