[council] RE: motion for the Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support FINAL REPORT

Olga Cavalli olgacavalli at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 16:08:03 UTC 2011


Hi,
I second this motion.
best regards
Olga

2011/9/14 Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>

>  Rafik,****
>
> ** **
>
> The motion has been posted on page :****
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you.****
>
> Kind regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Glen****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Glen de Saint Géry****
>
> GNSO Secretariat****
>
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org****
>
> http://gnso.icann.org****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* mercredi 14 septembre 2011 16:13
> *To:* Stéphane Van Gelder; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO
> *Cc:* Carlton Samuels; Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; Seth Greene; Robert
> Hoggarth; Karla Valente
> *Subject:* motion for the Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant
> Support FINAL REPORT****
>
> ** **
>
> Hello everyone, ****
>
> ** **
>
> I am glad to submit today the motion for the final report from JAS WG, ***
> *
>
> I attached the latest version of the report to be in time for GNSO motions
> deadline, and so you can start reviewing, I will submit anyway  the final
> version (it should be the current one with formatting/typo corrections if
> there is) to the GNSO and ALAC. thanks for your understanding.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks to Glen who already sent details about the webinar aimed to give
> to different C/SGs'  members of the chartering organizations presentation
> about the final report.****
>
> ** **
>
> Best,****
>
> ** **
>
> Rafik****
>
> ** **
>
>
> Whereas:
>
> The GNSO Council and ALAC established the Joint SO/AC Working Group (JASWG)
> on support for new gTLD applicants in April of 2010; and
>
> The Joint SO/AC Working Group released its  second Milestone Report, posted
> for consideration by the Board, Chartering Organizations and at-large
> Community. This report documented the completion of work as defined in the
> extended charter  and,
>
> The Joint SO/AC Working Group received and discussed the public comments,
> and
>
> The Joint SO/AC Working Group has completed the enumerated items as defined
> in its extended charter and has  published a final report (
> https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations#<https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations>)
> on 14 September 2011 covering those chartered items (
> http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#20110113-1) entitled Final Report of
> the Joint SO/AC new GTLD applicant support working group. and
>
> The Joint SO/AC Working Group is still in the process of completing some
> last tasks including completion of the formal documentation of the comment
> responses for the second milestone community review, and
>
> The GNSO council does not wish to delay implementation of support programs
> for applicants from developing regions,
>
>
> Resolved:
>
> The GNSO Council thanks the members of the Joint SO/AC Working Group for
> its efforts and its dedication to completing these work items on such a
> tight schedule, and
>
> The GNSO Council approves forwarding the  final Report  to the ICANN Board
> for review and approval, and
>
> The GNSO Council request ICANN staff begin working on implementation of the
> recommendations , and
>
> The GNSO Council requests that the Joint SO/AC Working Group complete the
> publication of its formal Milestone 2 response document as quickly as
> possible, and
>
> The GNSO Council requests that the Joint SO/AC Working Group remain on call
> to review the outcome of the ICANN implementation of the JAS
> recommendations.
>
> Resolved further, that the GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Chair to
> communicate its decision to the ALAC Chair.****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110914/a9d6bb09/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list