AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

[Neuman, Jeff]

I share Tim’s view on this one as well.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:19 AM
To: council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

I am not convinced it is a good idea to do this as a JWG in this manner.
I thought we were moving toward a GNSO WG, which of course are always
open to all regardless of SO or AC affiliation. I think that is the
quickest way to get Council agreement on this work AND to get it
completed. JWGs are still controversial for many of us and we need to
complete our work on that before initiating any further JWGs or CWGs.


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
> From: KnobenW at telekom.de
> Date: Thu, September 15, 2011 5:02 am
> To: <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>, <rosemary.sinclair at unsw.edu.au>,
> <Glen at icann.org>, <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
> Hi,
>
> Maybe it helps to use a lower case "joint" (jWG) until the frame for (J)WGs is fixed - or is this even more subtle?
> If not I'd like to propose it as a friendly amendment and second the motion.
>
>
> Kind regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Jonathan Robinson
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2011 16:24
> An: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'; 'GNSO Council List'
> Betreff: RE: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
>
>
> Hi Rosemary,
>
> The draft charter refers to a (GNSO) WG yet the motion refers to a JWG.
>
> Am I missing an obvious subtlety here?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
> Sent: 13 September 2011 21:38
> To: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
>
>
> Hi all
>
> I'd welcome any comments on the Motion I have proposed...
>
> And a seconder for the Motion!
>
> Cheers
>
> Rosemary
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf
> Of Glen de Saint Géry [Glen at icann.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:17 AM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] Motions on the Wiki page
>
> Dear Councillors,
>
> Please find the motions proposed by:
> - Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and seconded by Stéphane van Gelder on the revision of
> the GNSO Council Operating Procedures Relating to Proxy Voting
> - Rosemary Sinclair to create a joint working group on consumer choice,
> competition and innovation
> - Zahid Jamil to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse Policies Working
> Group Recommendations
>
> On the Wiki page:
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September
> +2011
>
> Thank you.
> Kind regards,
>
> Glen
>
>
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 6461 (20110913) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110915/9e86dde6/attachment.html>