[council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)

[Margie Milam]

Hi Kristina-

I can  answer this---- the language came from the original Board resolution that asked for the GNSO's response on this topic:  see: 
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6

Margie

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM
To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)


Rosemary,

An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer Choice, Competition, and Innovation".

I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with "Innovation."  Can you please advise?  

Many thanks!

K

 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)


I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar

So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....

Cheers

Rosemary

Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490

On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim at godaddy.com> wrote:

> 
> Rosemary and Wolf,
> 
> I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word 
> "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion 
> and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is 
> a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties 
> regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the 
> timing of the report.
> 
> Friendly amendments to the motion:
> 
> 1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
> 
> 2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon 
> after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth 
> (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely 
> that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, 
> etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
> 
> 3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
> 
> Friendly amendments to the Charter:
> 
> 1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
> 
> 2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
> 
> 3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to 
> "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
> 
> 4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all 
> interested parties."
> 
> 5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG 
> will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
> 
> Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to 
> include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should 
> simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where 
> it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate 
> reasoning.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
>