[council] Re: [gnso-chairs] AW: [soac-discussion] SOPA Discussions

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi John,

I didn't know that as gnso councillors we are supposed to act as auxiliary
agents for law enforcement...

Best,

Rafik Dammak

"fight for the users"



2012/2/8 <john at crediblecontext.com>

> I, too, think SOPA falls outside our scope.  Our mission ought to be to
> ensure that the DNS (and WhoIs) allows law enforcement to find those who
> commit crimes, not to decide what is a crime.
>
> Berard
>
>  -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Re: [gnso-chairs] AW: [soac-discussion] SOPA
> Discussions
> From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>
> Date: Tue, February 07, 2012 8:56 am
> To: "council at gnso.icann.org GNSO" <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>
> Councillors,
>
> Please find below an email chain starting with a message from the ALAC
> Chair. Thanks to Wolf for keeping me honest and reminding me that I had
> forgotten to copy the Council here ;)
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> Le 7 févr. 2012 à 16:06, <KnobenW at telekom.de> a écrit :
>
> > Stéphane,
> >
> > are you going to inform the council about Olivier's request?
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Wolf-Ulrich
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder at indom.com<stephane.vangelder at indom.com>]
>
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Februar 2012 11:01
> > An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
> > Cc: Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us; gnso-chairs at icann.org
> > Betreff: Re: [gnso-chairs] AW: [soac-discussion] SOPA Discussions
> >
> > I agree with Jeff 100%
> >
> > Stéphane
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 2 févr. 2012 à 22:27, <KnobenW at telekom.de> a écrit :
> >
> >>
> >> Jeff, I personally agree - with the knowledge I have so far.
> >>
> >> Nevertheless I expect different views from councillors. And I think the
> GNSO should be prepared just in case such a forum is going to be organized
> in Costa Rica.
> >>
> >> The ccNSO chair has answered to Olivier's request in favour. I think
> the GNSO chair should send an answer, too, based on GNSO discussions.
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >> Wolf-Ulrich
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us<Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us>]
>
> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2012 22:11
> >> An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; gnso-chairs at icann.org
> >> Betreff: RE: [soac-discussion] SOPA Discussions
> >>
> >> I have been keeping quiet about this on other lists, but no I do not
> believe this is an issue for the GNSO Council to discuss. This is a matter
> that effects national law and would represent a complete side track during
> the weekend from official GNSO business.
> >>
> >> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> >> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> >>
> >>
> >> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
> the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-chairs at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-chairs at icann.org<owner-gnso-chairs at icann.org>]
> On Behalf Of KnobenW at telekom.de
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 4:06 PM
> >> To: gnso-chairs at icann.org
> >> Subject: [gnso-chairs] WG: [soac-discussion] SOPA Discussions
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I wonder whether the GNSO could refrain from such a forum in San José.
> Is SOPA (and PIPA) effecting our policy work or not? I think a GNSO
> representative should participate in such a discussion.
> >> Should we put this on the GNSO weekend agenda in San José, too?
> >> Maybe there is interest in discussing the item with the GAC ?!
> >>
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >> Wolf-Ulrich
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: owner-soac-discussion at icann.org [
> mailto:owner-soac-discussion at icann.org <owner-soac-discussion at icann.org>]
> Im Auftrag von Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2012 08:27
> >> An: soac-discussion at icann.org
> >> Cc: ICANN AtLarge Staff
> >> Betreff: [soac-discussion] SOPA Discussions
> >>
> >>
> >> Dear SO/AC Chairs,
> >>
> >> a recent discussion on an ALAC call led to the question whether the
> ICANN community might be interested in holding a session in San José, to
> discuss the aspects of the SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and how it might
> affect ICANN policies that were reached through consensus.
> >>
> >> I am writing to you all to find out of this is something which your
> community might be interested in.
> >> As we are currently finalising schedules, it would be helpful to find
> out your community's views ASAP.
> >>
> >> Warmest regards,
> >>
> >> Olivier
> >>
> >> --
> >> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> >> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20120208/83c1c114/attachment.html>