[council] Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2

[Stéphane Van Gelder]

Thanks Marika.

I think it would be helpful for the Council to have two motions to consider at its next meeting, so that these staff proposals can be acted upon.

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 3 janv. 2012 à 12:45, Marika Konings a écrit :

> Dear All,
> 
> First of all, best wishes for 2012!
> 
> As you may recall, the GNSO Council resolved in June of last year in relation to two of the IRTP Part B recommendations (recommendation #8 concerning the standardization and clarification of Whois status messages regarding Registrar Lock status and recommendation #9 part 2 concerning a new provision to lock and unlock domain names) to request ICANN staff to provide proposals. In consultation with the IRTP Part B Working Group, ICANN Staff prepared these proposals which were subsequently put out for public comment (see http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-22nov11-en.htm). As no comments were received as part of the public comment forum, these proposals are now submitted to the GNSO Council for its consideration (see attached). 
> 
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika
> <IRTP Recommendation #9 Part 2 - Proposal from ICANN Staff - 22 November 2011.pdf><IRTP Recommendation #8 - Proposal from ICANN Staff - 22 November 2011.pdf>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20120105/c302b09f/attachment.html>