[council] Motion

Jonathan Robinson jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com
Thu Jun 7 08:32:20 UTC 2012


Hi Wolf-Ulrich,

 

This is something that we discussed at our SG meeting today.  We are expect
to ask for a deferral in part because the situation with the RAA still
contains many moving parts.

 

There are two key areas which we would very much appreciate further
clarification and detail through discussion or on the list as follows:

 

1.       As clear as possible definition or specification on what you intend
to achieve with the WHOIS access 

2.       A better understanding of what is meant by the reference to the RAA
PDP.  
This seems to imply that the entire RAA may be the subject of a PDP whereas
clearly there are parts of the RAA that are and parts that are not subject
to the PDP.

 

Many thanks for any comment or input you are able to provide either on list
or in the meeting itself.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

 

Jonathan

 

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
Behalf Of KnobenW at telekom.de
Sent: 30 May 2012 16:31
To: council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] Motion

 

On behalf of the ISPCP constituency I'd like to introduce the motion
attached to the 07 June council meeting.

 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20120607/faec1797/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list