[council] NOT-Swapping-BUT ADDING in IOC/RC for Fake Renewal

[Stéphane Van Gelder]

Thanks Zahid.

I would rather keep the election agenda as this is something we need to start preparing for now so although it does fit in the housekeeping category, it does not to be looked at.

The IOC was not put on the agenda initially, and when we sent the agenda out no-one requested it. The agenda has now been published as-is, but this could be brought up by you as AoB.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT

Le 27 juin 2012 à 13:38, Zahid Jamil a écrit :

> Would it be possible to replace Elections discussion and Management work items and replace it with IOC/RC/IGO - we can discuss that even at a later council call.  This maintains our substantive agenda and also includes IOC/RC/IGO discussion.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> Zahid Jamil
> Barrister-at-law
> Jamil & Jamil
> Barristers-at-law
> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
> Cell: +923008238230
> Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
> Fax: +92 21 5655026
> www.jamilandjamil.com
> 
> Notice / Disclaimer
> This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 27 Jun 2012, at 12:28, "Zahid Jamil" <zahid at dndrc.com> wrote:
> 
>> I would support an agenda item with respect to IC/RC/IGOs.
>> 
>> Zahid Jamil
>> Barrister-at-law
>> Jamil & Jamil
>> Barristers-at-law
>> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
>> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
>> Cell: +923008238230
>> Tel: +92 213 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
>> Fax: +92 213 5655026
>> www.jamilandjamil.com
>> 
>> Notice / Disclaimer
>> This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
>> 
>> 
>> *** This Message Has Been Sent Using BlackBerry Internet Service from Mobilink ***
>> From: John Berard <john at crediblecontext.com>
>> Sender: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
>> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:14:57 +0200
>> To: Alan Greenberg<alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry<Glen at icann.org>; council at gnso.icann.org<council at gnso.icann.org>
>> Subject: [council] Swapping in IOC/RC for Fake Renewal
>> 
>> In light of Alan's request and energy around the above noted protections, can we swap one for the other at the public meeting?
>> 
>> Berard
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>> 
>>> I will unfortunately have to leave the meeting early this afternoon. If a way can be found to defer this discussion until the next Council meeting, I would appreciate it. Given the schedule change, perhaps this will happen in any case.
>>> 
>>> Alan
>>> 
>>> At 26/06/2012 12:53 PM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
>>>> Item 11: Fake Renewal Notices (10 minutes)
>>>> The GNSO Council requested that a small group prepare a request for information concerning Fake Renewal Notices for the RrSG to help inform its deliberations on the RAP WG Recommendation on Fake Renewal Notices (#2). The drafting team submitted its report to the GNSO Council on 6 March. Following a presentation of the report to the GNSO Council at the ICANN Meeting in Costa Rica, the GNSO Council decided to put the report out for public comment. A public comment forum was opened (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21mar12-en.htm ) and has now closed. At its last meeting, the GNSO Council requested the DT to review the comments received, update the report if deemed appropriate and report back accordingly. The DT has reviewed the comments received and submitted its updated report to the GNSO Council on 21 June (see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg13234.html).
>>>> Presentation of updated Fake Renewal Notices Report (Mikey O'Connor)
>>>> Discussion and open microphone
>>>> Next steps

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20120627/682ba110/attachment.html>