[council] RE: GNSO Draft council statement on Saturday's Board decision
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Jun 28 09:50:51 UTC 2012
Here is the comment I made to David and Brian as well as the first
draft of the statement that the ALAC will consider (possibly for
adoption today).
Alan
---------------------
David, after a more careful review, I would suggest that you change
the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph. The Council was given a heads
up by Bruce that a discussion of the .com agreement was on the Board
agenda
(http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg13232.html),
but not that there was an intent to approve it.
Therefore I would suggest changing:
>However, neither the GNSO Council nor its constituencies were aware
>of the Board's closed session and adoption of the draft .com renewal agreement.
to
>However, although the GNSO Council and its constituencies were aware
>of the Board's intent to discuss the contract, we were not aware of
>its intent to approve the contract at its closed session.
You also have a small typo in the last sentence - ITS instead of IT.
The initial draft that I am recommending to the ALAC is:
>The At-Large Advisory Committee wishes to express its disappointment
>with the Board's decision to meet in a closed session on Saturday 23
>June to adopt the draft .com renewal agreement:
>http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-23jun12-en.htm#2.
>
>ICANN staff had placed this on the Thursday public forum agenda some
>time ago, and the .com renewal item remains on the public forum
>agenda tomorrow. Although we were aware that the .com agreement was
>on the Board's agenda, we were not aware of the intent to approve
>the agreement at its closed session.
>
>This comment is not with regard to the merits of the Board's action.
>The ALAC finds the process followed by the Board to be objectionable
>at a time when ICANN is subject to increased scrutiny. It is
>therefore imperative that the Board hold itself to the highest
>standards of transparency and accountability that it is mandated to uphold.
More information about the council
mailing list