[council] Minimum and average duration of a GNSO PDP
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu May 24 13:42:16 UTC 2012
Thanks for this Marika.
I think the minimum timetable presumes there will always be a council
meeting at exactly the time that we need one. Since I can recall only
one "special" Council meeting in my almost 6 years (on the RC/IOC), I
suspect this is unrealistic. Assuming a 4-week Council meeting cycle,
that adds about 6 weeks to the total.
It also presumes no time for SGs to consult which is perhaps not
unreasonable for a no-brainer PDP.
Alan
At 24/05/2012 06:12 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>Following requests during the last Council meeting, please find
>attached a timeline in which I've tried to outline the absolute
>minimum as well as the expected average timeline for a GNSO PDP to
>go from a request for an Issue Report to Board adoption. Please note
>that there are several assumptions included in the timetable in
>relation to the absolute minimum. Amongst others, in addition to the
>availability of staff and community resources, it assumes that the
>PDP concerns a narrowly defined issue with a high level of community
>consensus around the recommendations at an early stage of the
>process. As a reference, you also find attached an updated version
>of the GNSO PDP Timelines which tracks the duration of recent and ongoing PDPs.
>
>If you have any questions, please let me know.
>
>With best regards,
>
>Marika
>
>Sr. Policy Director
>ICANN
More information about the council
mailing list