[council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Oct 16 06:17:49 UTC 2012
Brian, several comments:
- does this imply that you will not be sending any of the detailed
breakdowns by SG/Const, including the explanatory notes that
- the use of the term SG is confusing, as it normally stands for
Stakeholder Group in the GNSO context.
- Ignoring the possibly confusing abbreviation, giving percentages of
the SG without any information about its constitution is not very informative.
- the reference to the GNSO's 6 constituencies is unclear, as the
GNSO has (I think!) five constituencies in two Stakeholder Groups,
and two Stakeholder Groups without constituencies.
At 16/10/2012 01:46 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote:
>As was discussed in Saturday's session with regard to the WHOIS RT
>work, attached please find a draft letter to the ICANN Board
>detailing our various constituencies' recommendations as to whether
>a PDP would be required for certain WHOIS enhancements.
>We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward
>to hearing your views so that we may move forward as soon as
>possible with providing our communication to the Board. Thank you.
>Brian J. Winterfeldt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the council