[council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations

[Alan Greenberg]

Brian, several comments:

- does this imply that you will not be sending any of the detailed 
breakdowns by SG/Const, including the explanatory notes that

- the use of the term SG is confusing, as it normally stands for 
Stakeholder Group in the GNSO context.

- Ignoring the possibly confusing abbreviation, giving percentages of 
the SG without any information about its constitution is not very informative.

- the reference to the GNSO's 6 constituencies is unclear, as the 
GNSO has (I think!) five constituencies in two Stakeholder Groups, 
and two Stakeholder Groups without constituencies.

Alan

At 16/10/2012 01:46 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote:
>Dear Councilors,
>
>As was discussed in Saturday's session with regard to the WHOIS RT 
>work, attached please find a draft letter to the ICANN Board 
>detailing our various constituencies' recommendations as to whether 
>a PDP would be required for certain WHOIS enhancements.
>
>We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward 
>to hearing your views so that we may move forward as soon as 
>possible with providing our communication to the Board.  Thank you.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Brian
>
>Brian J. Winterfeldt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20121016/d3bb374c/attachment.html>