AW: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

Margie,

my perception is that the SGs/constituencies have already responded through various channels (i.a. public comment) which of the rec's they are in support. Here we're really responding to the questions where we see a PDP might be needed or not.


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Margie Milam
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2012 11:12
An: Winterfeldt, Brian; council at gnso.icann.org
Betreff: RE: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations

Hi Brian-

A couple of observations on the draft letter:


*         The response only seems to focus on process, rather than substance.  In other words, it focuses on whether a PDP is required, and not whether the various Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies  agree with or endorse the recommendations.   Is this intentional?   The Board is likely to be more interested in the substantive response, although the procedural one seems to be the focus of the response.

*         With regard to  the response to Rec 12 (...that ICANN form a working group to determine IDN registration data requirements....)



"There were five (5) responsive members of the SG; 80% agreed that a PDP was not required to implement this recommendation."

Please note that this may need to be revised if the IRD WG Motion on the Council's agenda tomorrow is passed, because the PDP that would be started would be addressing this very issue.



Thanks,

Margie



______



Margie Milam

Senior Policy Counselor

ICANN

_______





From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Winterfeldt, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:47 AM
To: 'council at gnso.icann.org'
Subject: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations

Dear Councilors,

As was discussed in Saturday's session with regard to the WHOIS RT work, attached please find a draft letter to the ICANN Board detailing our various constituencies' recommendations as to whether a PDP would be required for certain WHOIS enhancements.

We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to hearing your views so that we may move forward as soon as possible with providing our communication to the Board.  Thank you.

Best regards,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt
Partner
bwinterfeldt at steptoe.com<mailto:bwinterfeldt at steptoe.com>
Steptoe

+1 202 429 6260 direct
+1 202 903 4422 mobile
+1 202 429 3902 fax

Steptoe & Johnson LLP - DC
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
www.steptoe.com<http://www.steptoe.com/>


+1 212.506.3935 direct
+1 212.506.3950 fax

Steptoe & Johnson LLP - New York
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20121016/da9bc1d3/attachment.html>