[gnso-iocrc-dt] Re: [council] Initiation of IGO/INGO Protection PDP

Margie Milam Margie.Milam at icann.org
Mon Oct 29 19:17:44 UTC 2012

Dear Chuck & Alan,

I am not sure why the PDP and the DT couldn't be blended at this point.    There has been criticism of the work of the drafting team because it was viewed by some as not following the proper process.   Under the flexibility of the new PDP rules,  this PDP could certainly do the work of analyzing the public comment, and developing the response to the Board request for the Council to consider by the deadline.   The issues are the same, so it would seem redundant to have two groups working on this topic simultaneously.

We envision that the two sub-teams work in parallel, and would not be mutually exclusive.  Does this address your & Alan's concerns?

All the best,
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 3:13 PM
To: Alan Greenberg; Brian Peck; council at gnso.icann.org; gnso-secs at icann.org
Cc: Margie Milam; Berry Cobb Mail; Marika Konings; iocRC DT
Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Re: [council] Initiation of IGO/INGO Protection PDP

I think I agree with Alan because the DT could more readily analyze the public comments and suggest modifications to the DT recommendations.  Moreover, the DT work could  be done concurrently with the formation of the PDP WG.  I am open to further discussion on this.


From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 8:20 PM
To: Brian Peck; council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>; gnso-secs at icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>
Cc: Margie Milam; Berry Cobb Mail; Marika Konings; iocRC DT
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Re: [council] Initiation of IGO/INGO Protection PDP

My inclination is to disagree on the last point. Sub-group A is likely to be superset of the DT (perhaps a large one) and I think the original DT should do the analysis and comments of the PC input (along with any changes to the recommendations of needed).


At 26/10/2012 06:13 PM, Brian Peck wrote:

Because the IOC/RCRC DT members will likely participate in the IGO-INGO PDP, Staff suggests that the current IOC/RCRC DT be suspended.  It is expected that the remaining IOC/RCRC DT efforts, after the close of the public comment period, will be addressed by sub-group A of the PDP WG mentioned above.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20121029/51c64a8c/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list