[council] Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures

Tue Apr 30 14:29:10 UTC 2013

I agree, Option 2 would complicate things too much. I thought that for 
24:00 where the sender is located might work too, but a tough deadline 
would be the clearer option.

Volker
> Hi,
>
> Since I proposed the reconfiguration to give people the clearest notice
> of when motions were due, I'd recommend option 1. I recognize that the
> amount of time wouldn't be quite the same from month to month, but the
> deadline would be fixed. (I preferred 8 calendar days, but 10 is a fine
> compromise.)
>
> --Wendy
>
>
> On 04/29/2013 03:02 PM, WUKnoben wrote:
>> We vary the meeting times to balance the incommodities as best as
>> possible. I think its consequent to vary the motion deadlines with the
>> meeting times, too (option #2).
>> The deadlines can be published with the meeting calendar in addition to
>> every single reminder.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Jonathan Robinson
>> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 3:31 PM
>> To: 'Zahid Jamil' ; 'Volker Greimann'
>> Cc: 'Wendy Seltzer' ; 'Marika Konings' ; council at gnso.icann.org
>> Subject: RE: [council] Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I'd like to close this off and move to posting it for public comment.
>>
>> My understanding is that we are agreed on 10 calendar days as this is
>> global
>> and meets what was originally intended.
>>
>> As far as a time-zone is concerned, we have two options:
>>
>> 1. Choose a fixed time zone in which the 23h59 cut-off occurs.  There is no
>> universally fair time zone to use for a global audience but UTC seems as
>> close to a standard as we have.
>> PST provides for a later sunset but is arguably less of a standard than
>> UTC.
>>
>> OR
>>
>> 2. Agree that the cut-off is 10 calendar days (exactly) before the meeting
>> occurs.  This will mean that the time of the cut-off varies on a per
>> meeting
>> basis.
>> This is probably most fair but could lead to confusion since it varies on a
>> per meeting basis.
>> Still, as long as the cut-off time is sent as part of the reminder in
>> calling for motions, it seems reasonable.
>>
>> Any comments or inputs, please provide them ASAP before we move to public
>> comment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
>> Behalf Of Zahid Jamil
>> Sent: 23 April 2013 14:47
>> To: Volker Greimann
>> Cc: Jonathan Robinson; Wendy Seltzer; Marika Konings;
>> <council at gnso.icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [council] Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures
>>
>>
>> How about using 23:59 PST as the deadline?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Zahid Jamil
>> Barrister-at-law
>> Jamil & Jamil
>> Barristers-at-law
>> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
>> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
>> Cell: +923008238230
>> Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
>> Fax: +92 21 35655026
>> www.jamilandjamil.com
>>
>> Notice / Disclaimer
>> This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
>> communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
>> recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>> Please
>> notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
>> message by
>> mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are
>> the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and
>> constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege.
>> The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind
>> whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in
>> any
>> medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or
>> some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and
>> consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 23 Apr 2013, at 16:45, Volker Greimann <vgreimann at key-systems.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> While I support this in general, I am not sure we really need such a
>> policy. The proposed language cuts the time available for bringing motions
>> short for our American councillors compared to right now.
>>> Volker
>>>
>>>> I support Wendy's language.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Zahid Jamil
>>>> Barrister-at-law
>>>> Jamil & Jamil
>>>> Barristers-at-law
>>>> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
>>>> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
>>>> Cell: +923008238230
>>>> Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
>>>> Fax: +92 21 35655026
>>>> www.jamilandjamil.com
>>>>
>>>> Notice / Disclaimer
>>>> This message contains confidential information and its contents are
>>>> being
>> communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
>> recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>> Please
>> notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
>> message by
>> mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are
>> the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and
>> constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege.
>> The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind
>> whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in
>> any
>> medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or
>> some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and
>> consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> On 23 Apr 2013, at 16:30, "Jonathan Robinson"
>> <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com> wrote:
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am in support of Wendy's wording (with a minor tweak) as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for
>>>>> inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than 23:59
>>>>> UTC on the day, 8 calendar days before the GNSO Council meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any concerns or objections, please raise ASAP otherwise I suggest we
>>>>> post for public comment.
>

-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.