[council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3

[Mason Cole]

Sorry for the confusion -- did this supersede the earlier draft?  If so, I'm fine with this one.


On Jun 18, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> I am good with this. 
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 
>  
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Novoa, Osvaldo
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: 'jrobinson at afilias.info'; council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: RE: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
>  
> All,
> I support this draft.
> Best regards,
> Osvaldo
>  
> De: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] En nombre de Jonathan Robinson
> Enviado el: Martes, 18 de Junio de 2013 16:41
> Para: council at gnso.icann.org
> Asunto: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
>  
> All,
>  
> I believe that the draft below reflects the position where we have got to so far.  I do not feel we have consensus on specific requests, only that the BGC be aware of the current position.
>  
> I trust you will be able to support this and recognise I have attempted to deal with this in as balanced and constructive a way as possible given the very tight timeline.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Jonathan
>  
>  
> Dear Bruce and Colleagues on the Board Governance Committee,
>  
> I am writing to you in my capacity as chair of the GNSO Council. 
>  
> As you are no doubt aware, the rationale prepared for the reconsideration request 13.3 has been the subject of significant Council and broader community discussion.
>  
> Concerns with the rationale, expressed by a number of Councillors, revolve around the extent to which the rationale may effectively set precedent and the associated impact on the ICANN multi-stakeholder model.  In other words, there is a view that the implications of the rationale go beyond the scope of dealing with the reconsideration request to which they pertain.
>  
> In the short time available since the Council first discussed this at our 13 June 2013 meeting, we have not yet formed a consensus or agreed GNSO Council position.
>  
> Nevertheless, I feel it is appropriate to flag with you the strength of views of on this this subject.
>  
> I trust that you will take this input to your business in the constructive spirit in which it is intended.
>  
> Yours sincerely,
>  
>  
>  
> Jonathan Robinson
> Chair, ICANN GNSO Council
>  
>  
> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
> 
> 
> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20130618/77c6b1da/attachment.html>