[council] TMCH RPM Requirements draft document

Volker Greimann vgreimann at key-Systems.net
Tue Oct 1 08:32:35 UTC 2013


Hi Marika,

thank you for that clarification. While this relieves part of my 
concern, I still feel that "baking" a single constituency into such a 
process and handing out special benefits is not the proper procedure for 
a multi-stakeholder organization, even if it is an opt-in process for 
the applicant.

Best,

Volker
> Dear All,
>
> Please find below a response from Cyrus Namazi in relation to the 
> paragraph referred to by Volker.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> /In response to community input, the TMCH Requirements were revised to 
> allow registry operators the ability to submit applications to conduct 
> launch programs.  In response to the large number of Geo TLDs who 
> voiced similar concerns, the IPC publicly stated that it would be 
> willing to work with Geo TLDs to develop mutually acceptable language 
> for Geo TLD launch programs.  We viewed this proposal as a way for 
> community members to work collectively to propose to ICANN a possible 
> solution for an issue specifically affecting intellectual property 
> rights-holders and Geo TLDs.  Any such proposal will be subject to 
> ICANN's review and ICANN has expressly stated that any such proposal 
> may be subject to public comment in which other interested community 
> members may participate. This is captured in Section 4.5.3./
> /
> /
> /As an alternative, applicants can unilaterally apply for a program 
> exemption under another provision of the requirements (Section 4.5.2). 
>  IPC was added to facilitate the discussion; not a condition to that 
> requirement. /
>
> From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann at key-Systems.net 
> <mailto:vgreimann at key-Systems.net>>
> Date: Monday 30 September 2013 19:03
> To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
> Cc: "council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>" 
> <council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
> Subject: [council] TMCH RPM Requirements draft document
>
> Dear fellow councillors,
>
> in the last week ICANN has released a final draft version of the TMCH 
> RPM Requirements, which contains in section 4.5.3 a paragraph that I 
> find to be questionable:
>
>
>   _4.5.3__If registry operators that indicated in their applications
>   for their TLDs that their TLD would be a geographic name ("__Geo
>   TLDs__") /and representatives of the Intellectual Property
>   Constituency/ recommend to ICANN the creation of a registration
>   program (...)
>   _
>
>
> Apparently, ICANN staff is considering to give one constituency 
> special consideration. While the subject at hand is probably closest 
> to the specific interests of that one constituency, giving any one 
> constituency or any part thereof an effective veto over a subject 
> matter that still has relevance to the other constituencies and 
> stakeholder groups is highly problematic and contrary to the spirit of 
> the multi-stakeholder principle. ICANN staff should consider all 
> stakeholders equally and not cater to a single stakeholder group. It 
> would be different if such a recommendation came from the GNSO council 
> itself.
>
> Further, stakeholder groups and constituencies may change over time, 
> so referencing one in such a process description may cause problems 
> down the line.
>
> I feel this topic needs to be raised on the council level as this is 
> only the most recent example of ICANN staff acting unilaterally in 
> favoring one interest over others.
> -- 
>
> Best regards,
>
> Volker Greimann
> --> 


-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20131001/9f10cfa8/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list