[council] FW: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13

[Klaus Stoll]

Dear Jonathan, Dear Philip

Thanks!, that perfectly answers my question. Much appreciated.

That brings me to something different. I there any chance to see the 
comments, questions and answers too the ICANN legal staff, we might be 
much clearer and avoid asking questions twice.

Yours

Klaus

On 4/15/2014 8:01 AM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Please see note below from Philip Sheppard.
>
> Jonathan
>
> *From:*BRG [mailto:philip at brandregistrygroup.org]
> *Sent:* 14 April 2014 17:03
> *To:* jonathan.robinson at iprota.com
> *Subject:* GNSO Council discussion Spec 13
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I noted that Klaus on the Council list asked this question:
>
> BTW: what happens if a brand gTLD decides down the road to give up 
> exclusivity and become available for general use, at some point that 
> might make perfect business sense.
>
> As I cannot post to Council, perhaps you would do so for me.
>
> Its a legitimate question and one also asked by ICANN legal staff.
>
> The answer is in other provisions of Spec 13. In the circumstances 
> described by Klaus, all of Spec 13 would immediately no longer 
> apply, and the default RA would apply instead.
>
> Philip
>
> Philip Sheppard
>
> Director General
>
> Brand Registry Group
>
> www.brandregistrygroup.org <http://www.brandregistrygroup.org/>
>
> Skype phsheppard
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140415/9b6b9783/attachment.html>