[council] Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2) Final Report & Recommendations
Klaus Stoll
kdrstoll at gmail.com
Fri Feb 21 14:02:10 UTC 2014
Fine with me as long as we don't start breading more "experts".
Klaus
On 2/21/2014 2:46 PM, Reed, Daniel A wrote:
>
> I think this is fine.
>
> Dan
>
> *From:*owner-council at gnso.icann.org
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike O'Connor
> *Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2014 7:04 AM
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Second Accountability and Transparency Review
> Team (ATRT 2) Final Report & Recommendations
>
> hi all,
>
> i agree Maria. i had a go at adding another paragraph to our response
> to Rec #10.3 and have attached the revised draft. but to save you
> time, here’s the language i inserted
>
> "The ATRT2 report documents how a very small group of dedicated
> volunteers carry an extraordinary proportion of the working-group load
> and correctly identifies this as a major concern. We note that simply
> increasing the pool of people aware of and in some way engaged with
> ICANN should not be viewed as the goal. Ultimately what is needed is
> a larger and more diverse group of active and effective participants
> in PDP working groups. Although outreach is an important part of the
> effort and crucial for bringing newcomers to ICANN, the path to this
> goal should not end at simply recruiting a large diverse group of
> people. Rather, there needs to be a clear and well-supported
> progression for newcomers to gain the skills, knowledge and experience
> needed to broaden the ranks of active PDP participants and leaders.”
>
> happy to consider revisions.
>
> mikey
>
> On Feb 21, 2014, at 3:56 AM, Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com
> <mailto:maria.farrell at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I'm happy to support this, and thank you for drafting it. There's
> one small typo, track changes version attached. It's in para 1,
> page 3.
>
> I'd have liked if we tackled head-on the issue of the narrowness
> of some PDP WGs' participation, which the ATRT2 report provided
> some pretty convincing numbers on. But as I haven't gone to the
> trouble of actually drafting anything on it, I can't complain.
>
> All the best, Maria
>
> On 21 February 2014 09:15, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> As a member of the ATRT2, I do not believe it my job to
> comment on our report.
>
> I think the GNSO response is fine as far as it goes and I am
> pleased that at least something is being submitted - though I
> must admit I am less than enthused about responses that
> essentially say "we are already doing that".
>
> I might have wished for it to be more supportive of other
> aspects of the report, but the response is what it is.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 21-Feb-14 09:43, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>
> *_PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN 8 HOURS_*
>
> *From:*Jonathan Robinson
> [mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com
> <mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>]
> *Sent:* 20 February 2014 09:38
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject:* RE: Second Accountability and Transparency
> Review Team (ATRT
>
>
> 2) Final Report & Recommendations
>
> All,
>
> The deadline for submission of public comment on the ends
> approximately
> 36 hours from now.
>
> I am OK to submit a letter in substantially the same for
> as that
> distributed to you on 14 Feb (see below) and re-attached
> to this letter.
>
> BUT
>
> I need your support to do so. Accordingly, even if you
> simply provide
> support without any comment on the content, that will be
> helpful.
>
> *_PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN 24 HOURS_*
>
> Thank-you.
>
> Jonathan
>
> *From:*Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info
> <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>]
> *Sent:* 14 February 2014 17:21
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
> <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
> *Subject:* Second Accountability and Transparency Review
> Team (ATRT 2)
> Final Report & Recommendations
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> All,
>
> If you are not already, please be aware of the following:
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/atrt2-recommendations-09jan14-en.htm
>
> The opportunity to provide comments _ends one week from
> today 23h59 UTC
> on 21 Feb 2014_.
>
>
>
> The ATRT2 interacted with many in the community during the
> course of its
> work, including directly with the GNSO Council which was
> certainly
> appreciated. We now have an opportunity to comment on the
> final report.
>
> If we do intend to comment, my opinion is that we should
> at least submit
> an indication of intent, if not the primary comment, in
> the initial
> comment period and not wait for the reply period.
>
> Given the tight time frame, I have taken the unusual step
> of drafting a
> council response for your consideration. The ATRT2 deals
> with some
> critical areas of GNSO work and function and so it seems
> to me that we
> should respond to the call for comments, specifically in
> so far as the
> report deals with GNSO Policy and directly related areas.
>
> I am aware that some of you were on the ATRT2 and others
> actively worked
> on Council interaction with the ATRT2. Therefore, you may
> well have
> strong views on the subject matter.
>
> I look forward to your input and any suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> <ATRT2 - Draft Council Input (14 February 2014).doc>
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
> <http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook,
> LinkedIn, etc.)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140221/4ee9db43/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list