[council] Draft Singapore schedule

[Thomas Rickert]

Thanks for your work on this, David!

I would very much like to discuss the issue of universal acceptance. One might say that this is an issue for others to resolve, but ICANN will likely be seen as a responsible party for not having taken sufficient steps to ensure new gTLDs "work". Since the original policy recommendations have been made by the GNSO, it appears to be appropriate for the Council to follow-up on this.

Thomas


Am 25.02.2014 um 16:35 schrieb David Cake <dave at DIFFERENCE.COM.AU>:

> 	Please find attached a draft schedule for GNSO activities for the Singapore meeting. 
> 	Please understand that, though interactions with senior ICANN staff and the board have to contend with very busy schedules, and so may be awkward to change, this is very much a draft schedule, presented for Council discussion and input - please feel free to suggest additional items, or remove them. You'll notice that 15 minutes per WG fills up a fair bit of our schedule, and we have allocated 30 minutes for some - comments on this appreciated. 
> 	I very much appreciate your input either on list, or on the Council call. 
> 	
> 	One item I'll note isn't currently on the schedule - the RSSAC is meeting at the Singapore meeting, and this is very unusual. We currently don't have any RSSAC/GNSO interaction scheduled - if council members think this would be valuable, please say so ASAP. Such interaction would have to be from Monday to Wednesday. 
> 	Regards
> 
> 		David
> 
> 
> 
> 		<Singapore  PUBLIC Draft Agenda v3 (2).xlsx>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140225/54259214/signature.asc>