[council] Draft Singapore schedule

[Thomas Rickert]

Hi Marika,
my bad. It's in there. Read the agenda too quickly. Since the topic is being discussed more and more, I guess it would be helpful to make it more explicit to show that the Council is taking care of it.

Thanks
Thomas

Am 25.02.2014 um 18:55 schrieb Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>:

> Thomas, as the JIG has been requested to provide the GNSO Council with
> suggestions on how to deal with IDN Variants and universal acceptance and
> deliver these suggestions to the GNSO Council by the ICANN Singapore
> meeting, it was envisioned that this conversation could happen in that
> slot (Saturday from 11.30 - 12.00) but maybe that could be made more
> explicit?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> On 25/02/14 18:35, "Thomas Rickert" <rickert at anwaelte.de> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for your work on this, David!
>> 
>> I would very much like to discuss the issue of universal acceptance. One
>> might say that this is an issue for others to resolve, but ICANN will
>> likely be seen as a responsible party for not having taken sufficient
>> steps to ensure new gTLDs "work". Since the original policy
>> recommendations have been made by the GNSO, it appears to be appropriate
>> for the Council to follow-up on this.
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> 
>> Am 25.02.2014 um 16:35 schrieb David Cake <dave at DIFFERENCE.COM.AU>:
>> 
>>> 	Please find attached a draft schedule for GNSO activities for the
>>> Singapore meeting.
>>> 	Please understand that, though interactions with senior ICANN staff
>>> and the board have to contend with very busy schedules, and so may be
>>> awkward to change, this is very much a draft schedule, presented for
>>> Council discussion and input - please feel free to suggest additional
>>> items, or remove them. You'll notice that 15 minutes per WG fills up a
>>> fair bit of our schedule, and we have allocated 30 minutes for some -
>>> comments on this appreciated.
>>> 	I very much appreciate your input either on list, or on the Council
>>> call. 
>>> 	
>>> 	One item I'll note isn't currently on the schedule - the RSSAC is
>>> meeting at the Singapore meeting, and this is very unusual. We currently
>>> don't have any RSSAC/GNSO interaction scheduled - if council members
>>> think this would be valuable, please say so ASAP. Such interaction would
>>> have to be from Monday to Wednesday.
>>> 	Regards
>>> 
>>> 		David
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 		<Singapore  PUBLIC Draft Agenda v3 (2).xlsx>
>> 
> 
> <default.xml>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140226/2a1202f4/signature.asc>