[council] Draft Singapore schedule

[Mike O'Connor]

hi all (again).

egad.  a double apology.  here are a couple ideas

- expand the time again, maybe just little more

- set the expectations for how that time is to be used. 

my fear is that we’ll get a long slide deck that will fill up the time and give us little opportunity to interact as a group.  

m
 
On Feb 26, 2014, at 4:28 AM, David Cake <dave at difference.com.au> wrote:

> And it is due to the report that we have given the JIG 30 minutes rather than the 15 that most WGs have for been allotted. 
> Is that time sufficient, or should we expand it? 
> 
> Regards
> 
> David
> On 26 Feb 2014, at 1:55 am, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
> 
>> Thomas, as the JIG has been requested to provide the GNSO Council with
>> suggestions on how to deal with IDN Variants and universal acceptance and
>> deliver these suggestions to the GNSO Council by the ICANN Singapore
>> meeting, it was envisioned that this conversation could happen in that
>> slot (Saturday from 11.30 - 12.00) but maybe that could be made more
>> explicit?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
>> 
>> On 25/02/14 18:35, "Thomas Rickert" <rickert at anwaelte.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for your work on this, David!
>>> 
>>> I would very much like to discuss the issue of universal acceptance. One
>>> might say that this is an issue for others to resolve, but ICANN will
>>> likely be seen as a responsible party for not having taken sufficient
>>> steps to ensure new gTLDs "work". Since the original policy
>>> recommendations have been made by the GNSO, it appears to be appropriate
>>> for the Council to follow-up on this.
>>> 
>>> Thomas
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 25.02.2014 um 16:35 schrieb David Cake <dave at DIFFERENCE.COM.AU>:
>>> 
>>>> 	Please find attached a draft schedule for GNSO activities for the
>>>> Singapore meeting.
>>>> 	Please understand that, though interactions with senior ICANN staff
>>>> and the board have to contend with very busy schedules, and so may be
>>>> awkward to change, this is very much a draft schedule, presented for
>>>> Council discussion and input - please feel free to suggest additional
>>>> items, or remove them. You'll notice that 15 minutes per WG fills up a
>>>> fair bit of our schedule, and we have allocated 30 minutes for some -
>>>> comments on this appreciated.
>>>> 	I very much appreciate your input either on list, or on the Council
>>>> call. 
>>>> 	
>>>> 	One item I'll note isn't currently on the schedule - the RSSAC is
>>>> meeting at the Singapore meeting, and this is very unusual. We currently
>>>> don't have any RSSAC/GNSO interaction scheduled - if council members
>>>> think this would be valuable, please say so ASAP. Such interaction would
>>>> have to be from Monday to Wednesday.
>>>> 	Regards
>>>> 
>>>> 		David
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 		<Singapore  PUBLIC Draft Agenda v3 (2).xlsx>
>>> 
>> 
>> <default.xml>
> 


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140226/f0482691/smime.p7s>