[council] Draft Motion for Approval of Revised GNSO Operating Procedures
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Fri Mar 14 14:33:32 UTC 2014
It does need a second.
avri
On 14-Mar-14 09:55, Maria Farrell wrote:
> Thanks, Avri.
>
> Do you need a second for this motion?
>
> Maria
>
>
> On 14 March 2014 13:06, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Attached is a motion and a red line Revision of the GNSO Operating
> principles addressing the following issues:
>
> > a. the current GNSO Operating
> > Procedures do not contain a specific provision on the possibility of
> > resubmitting a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; and
>
> b. the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form
> Annex I of
> the GNSO Operating Procedures, do not contain a mechanism for
> Working
> Groups (WGs) to self-assess their work.
>
>
> These issues were referred to the SCI by the GNSO Council.
>
> These recommendations are made by the SCI after discussions that led
> to full consensus in the Committee.
>
> Thanks
>
> Avri Doria
> Acting as GNSO Council liaison to SCI
>
>
>
More information about the council
mailing list