[council] Draft Motion for Approval of Revised GNSO Operating Procedures

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Fri Mar 14 14:33:32 UTC 2014


It does need a second.

avri


On 14-Mar-14 09:55, Maria Farrell wrote:
> Thanks, Avri.
>
> Do you need a second for this motion?
>
> Maria
>
>
> On 14 March 2014 13:06, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Attached is a motion and a red line Revision of the GNSO Operating
>     principles addressing the following issues:
>
>      > a.    the current GNSO Operating
>      > Procedures do not contain a specific provision on the possibility of
>      > resubmitting a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; and
>
>         b.      the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form
>         Annex I of
>         the GNSO Operating Procedures, do not contain a mechanism for
>         Working
>         Groups (WGs) to self-assess their work.
>
>
>     These issues were referred to the SCI by the GNSO Council.
>
>     These recommendations are made by the SCI after discussions that led
>     to full consensus in the Committee.
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Avri Doria
>     Acting as GNSO Council liaison to SCI
>
>
>



More information about the council mailing list