[council] ICANN & NTIA

[Maria Farrell]

+1 on the discussion and also the intent to ultimately supply Jonathan with
a clear mandate, if thats' what other councilors end up agreeing with.

And good morning, Singapore!

Good luck to all traveling today.

Maria


On 21 March 2014 08:42, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info> wrote:

> There is the prospect of a joint AC/SO/SG leaders statement being
> discussed.
>
> It has some momentum although I am aware that the Registries are still
> discussing detail on the content.
>
> Attached is a copy of the latest draft, which originated with ICANN staff
> and has been commented on since.
>
> Jonathan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert at anwaelte.de]
> Sent: 21 March 2014 04:14
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: Re: [council] ICANN & NTIA
>
>
> Hi Avri,
> I would very much support the idea of equipping Jonathan with a robust
> mandate.
>
> Best,
> Thomas
>
> =============
> thomas-rickert.tel
> +49.228.74.898.0
>
> > Am 20.03.2014 um 07:44 schrieb Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know it is too late for a motion, but will there be an opportunity to
> get 'sense of the council/gnso' on support for ICANN in this NTIA process?
> >
> > Personally I would like to see Jonathan able to support the ongoing work,
> without committing to any particular endpoint, but in the name of the GNSO
> of which he is chair.
> >
> > I know we have an agenda of very important issues, but I beleive we
> cannot
> afford to ignore this milestone in Internet governance without push
> ourselves further into irrelevancy.
> >
> > avrti
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140321/409f2058/attachment.html>