[council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda

[Thomas Rickert]

Same here!

Thomas


Am 24.03.2014 um 05:25 schrieb Reed, Daniel A <dan-reed at uiowa.edu>:

> Likewise
>  
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Magaly Pazello
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 11:32 AM
> To: Amr Elsadr
> Cc: Avri Doria; GNSO Council List
> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda
>  
> +1
> 
> Magaly
> 
> On Sunday, March 23, 2014, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
> >
> > So do I. I believe this discussion is overdue. Thanks for suggesting it, James.
> >
> > Amr
> >
> > On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:30 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I support including the discussion item in the agenda.
> >>
> >> avri
> >>
> >> On 23-Mar-14 20:26, James M. Bladel wrote:
> >>> Councilors:
> >>>
> >>> As discussed, here is my proposal agenda add (vetted by Maria & Thomas)
> >>> for a discussion during Wednesday’s open session.  Would be happy to
> >>> hear comments/edits.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks—
> >>>
> >>> J.
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> *Discussion item: Data retention waiver and the apparent conflict of
> >>> national data protection laws with the 2013 RAA *
> >>>
> >>> Many European registrars have expressed frustration with ICANN’s
> >>> handling of their waiver requests from the Data Retention requirements
> >>> under the 2013 RAA, particularly considering recent statements by
> >>> various data protection authorities that these requirements violate
> >>> national privacy laws. Other ICANN stakeholders have expressed concern
> >>> about the treatment of legal data protection requirements when the ICANN
> >>> contract appears to conflict with certain laws. Still other stakeholders
> >>> are concerned that the ability of law enforcement and private
> >>> enforcement actions to access data be kept in place. The RAA includes
> >>> language that allows ICANN to temporarily suspend enforcement of the
> >>> data retention provisions.  As this situation has now been ongoing for
> >>> over six months, pending a resolution of the issue, should the GNSO
> >>> Council and larger ICANN Community direct ICANN Staff to suspend
> >>> enforcement for any registrar requesting a waiver?
> >>>
> >
> >
> >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140324/aaaf1afe/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140324/aaaf1afe/signature.asc>