[council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda

[Mike O'Connor]

i’m in.

m

On Mar 24, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de> wrote:

> Same here!
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> Am 24.03.2014 um 05:25 schrieb Reed, Daniel A <dan-reed at uiowa.edu>:
> 
>> Likewise
>>  
>> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Magaly Pazello
>> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 11:32 AM
>> To: Amr Elsadr
>> Cc: Avri Doria; GNSO Council List
>> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda
>>  
>> +1
>> 
>> Magaly
>> 
>> On Sunday, March 23, 2014, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > So do I. I believe this discussion is overdue. Thanks for suggesting it, James.
>> >
>> > Amr
>> >
>> > On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:30 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I support including the discussion item in the agenda.
>> >>
>> >> avri
>> >>
>> >> On 23-Mar-14 20:26, James M. Bladel wrote:
>> >>> Councilors:
>> >>>
>> >>> As discussed, here is my proposal agenda add (vetted by Maria & Thomas)
>> >>> for a discussion during Wednesday’s open session.  Would be happy to
>> >>> hear comments/edits.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks—
>> >>>
>> >>> J.
>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>
>> >>> *Discussion item: Data retention waiver and the apparent conflict of
>> >>> national data protection laws with the 2013 RAA *
>> >>>
>> >>> Many European registrars have expressed frustration with ICANN’s
>> >>> handling of their waiver requests from the Data Retention requirements
>> >>> under the 2013 RAA, particularly considering recent statements by
>> >>> various data protection authorities that these requirements violate
>> >>> national privacy laws. Other ICANN stakeholders have expressed concern
>> >>> about the treatment of legal data protection requirements when the ICANN
>> >>> contract appears to conflict with certain laws. Still other stakeholders
>> >>> are concerned that the ability of law enforcement and private
>> >>> enforcement actions to access data be kept in place. The RAA includes
>> >>> language that allows ICANN to temporarily suspend enforcement of the
>> >>> data retention provisions.  As this situation has now been ongoing for
>> >>> over six months, pending a resolution of the issue, should the GNSO
>> >>> Council and larger ICANN Community direct ICANN Staff to suspend
>> >>> enforcement for any registrar requesting a waiver?
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
> 


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140324/ff4531c2/attachment.html>