[council] Motion for the creation of CWG-IG

Wed Oct 15 18:53:51 UTC 2014

Dear Brian,

It's up to Avri to consider whether this amendment can be considered
friendly or not, but it looks quite troublesome to me. It would almost
double the number of GNSO reps on the WG, significantly changing the
carefully agreed make-up.

Given that the ccNSO and ALAC have already approved the charter as is, how
should we expect them to react to a last minute change to the relative
numbers of representatives on the WG?

Should they go back and vote our amended version through again? (I can't
see them doing that.)

I am very concerned that this amendment would put the whole CCWG initiative
in jeopardy and don't understand why such a substantive change to a charter
that's been held up since May - at the request of the CSG - would be
suggested at the last minute.

Maria

On 15 October 2014 09:00, Winterfeldt, Brian J. <
brian.winterfeldt at kattenlaw.com> wrote:

>  Dear Avri and all:
>
>
>
> I write to offer a potentially friendly amendment to the motion for the
> creation of the CWG-IG.
>
>
>
> By way of background, the current motion reads that “Each GNSO Stakeholder
> Group will identify one member to serve on the CWG-IG by 15-October-2014.”
> The IPC feels that this is an oversimplification.  Instead, in conformity
> with the CWG-IG Charter, and discussions among the Charter drafting team,
> we propose that the motion instead read as follows:
>
>
>
> Each GNSO Stakeholder Group*, or (where a stakeholder group consists of
> separate constituencies) each constituency, notwithstanding the GNSO
> Co-Chair appointment,* will identify one member to serve on the CWG-IG by
> 15-October-2014.
>
>
>
> We hope this revised language and level of clarity meets with your
> approval.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *Brian J. Winterfeldt *
> Head of Internet Practice
> *Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP*
>
> 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118
> p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244
>
> 575 Madison Avenue / New York, NY 10022-2585
> p / (212) 940.6762  f / (212) 894.5585
> brian.winterfeldt at kattenlaw.com / www.kattenlaw.com
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
>
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.orgOn Behalf OfAvri Doria
>
> Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 11:40:08 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US &
> Canada)
>
> To: council at gnso.icann.org
>
> Subject: Re: [council] Motion for the creation of CWG-IG
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> noticed at least two typos in the motion.
>
>
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 03-Oct-14 11:32, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > Please find a motion for approving the charter of the CWG-IG as was
>
> > discussed at our last meeting.
>
> >
>
> > Since James and I worked on this, I have added his name as seconder
>
> > but he needs to either accept or reject that.
>
> >
>
> > Note the last item in the motion:
>
> >
>
> >> 4.  As the charter calls for each of the chartering organizations to
>
> >> appoint a co-chair for the group, the GNSO Council appoints  <name
>
> >> here> to serve as a member of the CWG-IG, to serve as the GNSO
>
> >> co-chair of the CWG-IG, and to serve as GNSO Council liaison to the
>
> >> group.
>
> >
>
> > We need to decide which name goes here.  Does no necessarily need to
>
> > be the same person for co-chair and liaison.  Rafik Dammak is a
>
> > current co-facilitator for the group from the GNSO side.
>
> >
>
> > Thanks
>
> >
>
> > avri
>
> > --
>
> >
>
> > Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group  to discuss
>
> > Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN and make
>
> > recommendation to the chartering organization on these issues
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Made by: Avri Doria
>
> > Seconded by: James Bladel (?)
>
>
>
> (?) can be removed
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Whereas,
>
> >
>
> >     This group was initiated in December 2013 in response to a call
>
> > from ICANN CEO and has been working informally since then;
>
> >
>
> >     The group has developed the charter found at
>
> > <https://community.icann.org/x/ryufAg> [attached];
>
> >
>
> >     This charter has already been approved by ALAC, ccNSO and SSAC.
>
> >
>
> > Resolved:
>
> >
>
> > The GNSO Council approves the Charter
>
> > <https://community.icann.org/x/ryufAg>.
>
> >
>
> > Each  GNSO Stakeholder Group will identify one member to serve on the
>
> > CWG-IG by 15-October-2014  taking into account the charter requirement
>
> > that best efforts  should be made to ensure that members:
>
> >
>
> >     - Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable
>
> > subject matter;
>
> >
>
> >     - Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CWG-IG
>
> > on an ongoing and long-term basis; and
>
> >
>
> >     - Where appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and
>
> > concerns of individuals in the organization that appoints them.
>
> >
>
> > 3.  The GNSO will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a
>
> > call  for observers to join the CWG-IG, each in accordance with its own
> rules.
>
> >
>
> > 4.  As the charter calls for each of the chartering organization to
>
>
>
> Should be: As the charter calls for each of the chartering organizations to
>
>
>
> > appoint a co-chair for the group, the GNSO Council appoints  <name
>
> > here> to serve as a member of the CWG-IG, to serve as the GNSO
>
> > co-chair of the CSG-IG and to serve as GNSO Council liaison to the group.
>
>
>
> Should be  CWG-IG and to serve as GNSO Council liaison to the group.
>
>
>
> >
>
> ===========================================================
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or
> distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction.  Please notify
> the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original
> message without making any copies.
> ===========================================================
> NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has
> elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
> ===========================================================
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20141015/1ab41973/attachment.html>