[council] questions re IGO/INGO motion

[Jonathan Robinson]

Thanks James,

 

Good questions. I have forwarded to Chris.

 

Jonathan

 

From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com] 
Sent: 03 September 2014 21:22
To: Thomas Rickert; GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] questions re IGO/INGO motion

 

Thomas & Team:

 

Sorry for the late response, but didn't want to "blind side" Chris with my
questions during tomorrow's meeting.

 

I have only two questions

(1)  This PDP affects incumbent gTLDs (including new gTLDs), why is it being
handled by the NGPC and not the full board?  I have not received an answer
to this process change.

(2)  In light of the GAC's statements in the London Communique, has the NGPC
or Board changed its position on the likelihood that this approach will be
successful?  Or is this effort at a compromise "DOA"?

 

J.

 

From: Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de>
Date: Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 12:24 
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] questions re IGO/INGO motion

 

All, 

we had discussed during the last Council call that it would be helpful to
provide the NGPC / Chris Disspain with questions Councillors might have.
Would you be as kind as to send your questions to the list in preparation of
the upcoming call? 

 

Thanks and kind regards,

Thomas

 

___________________________________________________________
Thomas Rickert, Attorney at Law

Managing Partner, Schollmeyer & Rickert Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
www.anwaelte.de

Director Names & Numbers, eco Association of the German Internet Industry
www.eco.de

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140904/4d6f1176/attachment.html>