[council] ISPCP Endorsement Candidates for CCT-RT

Phil Corwin psc at vlaw-dc.com
Wed Dec 16 22:46:30 UTC 2015


No, those are just ISPCP endorsements. CSG needs to coalesce.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW. Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell
Twitter: @VLawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: Edward Morris
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 5:27 PM
To: council at gnso.icann.org; WUKnoben
Reply To: egmorris1 at toast.net
Subject: re: [council] ISPCP Endorsement Candidates for CCT-RT


Hi Wolf-Ulrich,

Can I assume these three names are being submitted on behalf of the entire Commercial Stakeholder Group? My understanding is that in accordance with the GNSO governing structure each SG, not Constituency,  was to nominate between 0-3 applicants.

We are still deliberating our selections amongst many fine applicants from the NonCommercial Stakeholders Group and look forward to communicating our decision to everyone prior to tomorrow's meeting.

Best,

Ed Morris

________________________________
From: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:37 PM
To: council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] ISPCP Endorsement Candidates for CCT-RT

All,

the ISPCP constituency is in support for endorsement of the following candidates to the CCT-RT:

  1.
Carlos Gutierrez
  2.
Jonathan Zuck
  3.
Waudo Siganga


We’re open to a discussion for finding the appropriate GNSO representation on this review team.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich


From: Drazek, Keith<mailto:kdrazek at Verisign.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 6:38 PM
To: council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] RySG Endorsement Candidates for CCT-RT

Hi all,

The RySG respectfully submits the following 3 candidates for endorsement:


·         Jeff Neuman

·         Jordyn Buchanan

·         Nacho Amadoz

Thanks and regards,
Keith

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 12:28 PM
To: Jennifer Gore Standiford; council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] Re: RrSG endorsement announcement

Acknowledged, Jennifer.  Thank you.

J.

From: Jennifer Standiford <JStandiford at web.com<mailto:JStandiford at web.com>>
Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 11:18
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>, James Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>
Subject: RrSG endorsement announcement

James and Council Members,

The Registrar Stakeholder Group would like to support the endorsement of the following three (3) candidates for the CCT Review Team.

?         Calvin Brown

?         Gregory DiBiase

?         Ben Anderson

Thank you,
Jennifer

Jennifer Gore Standiford
Senior Policy Director
Web.com
12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West  |  Jacksonville, FL 32258
Office: 904. 680-6919| Cell: 904. 401-4347
[cid:image003.png at 01CFD6B5.902BADC0]




From:owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 3:31 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: Fwd: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

Hi folks -

Just a reminder to please take a look at the revised CCT-RT endorsement process (attached), and let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  Ideally, we should get this finalized in the next day or so to allow the SGs to meet & discuss their slate of candidates seeking endorsement.  FOr those on the go, the key points are: (a) increasing the GNSO delegation to 8-10, and (b) tasking each SG to submit 0-2 candidates for endorsement.

Marika has reached out to her counterpart(s) and asked each candidate to respond to the GNSO-specific questions, with candidates given until 7 DEC to respond.


Thank you,

J.
____________
James Bladel
GoDaddy

Begin forwarded message:
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>
Date: November 24, 2015 at 18:48:05 CST
To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>, "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at winston.com<mailto:PMcGrady at winston.com>>, Volker Greimann <vgreimann at key-Systems.net<mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net>>, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca<mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER
Colleagues -

Getting caught up on on this thread (in reverse order!) and agree with key points raised by Paul, Wolf & Volker.   I concur with Wolf-Ulrich that we should shorten the list to preserve the weight & value of GNSO endorsement, but to Paul’s point, having a slate of 4 candidates may have covered previous RTs, but will not provide sufficient coverage/balance here, as the CCT-RT disproportionately results from, and affects, the GNSO Community.  Off the cuff, the right number of candidates is probably 8-10, which would make this RT a bit larger than usual, with the GNSO delegation its largest component.

I agree with Marika’s suggestion to reach out to candidates seeking GNSO endorsement and ask them to specifically address the GNSO criteria, and that we also ask our Liaisons to provide some insights on how the ALAC and ccNSO are selecting their candidates.

I think the draft process and timeline that Wolf posted on 21 NOV (attached here) is generally hitting the right deliverables, but I think we need an extra couple of days to to finalize the process and allow candidates to respond to Marika’s request.  We can then proceed to ask the SGs for their endorsed candidates.

With that in mind, please take a look at the draft process (attached),  and respond as soon as possible (but definitively by Monday 30 NOV) if they have any concerns/objections/edits?

Thanks—

J.




From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 14:13
To: "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at winston.com<mailto:PMcGrady at winston.com>>, Volker Greimann <vgreimann at key-Systems.net<mailto:vgreimann at key-Systems.net>>, James Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca<mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

I understand the concerns, in particular since no limit has been preset with respect to the review team membership.

Can our liaisons – Olivier for ALAC and Patrick for ccNSO – disclose how their respective SO is dealing with the question? From the published list of applications – maybe it’s not the most recent one - I count 9 ALAC, 3 ccNSO, 3 GAC, 27 GNSO and 31 Independent. So “dozens” could just come from the GNSO.
Limitation seems to me necessary to let the GNSO appear being credible. And we should avoid discussions between our groups about which applicant may be more appropriate in comparison to others. The SGs/constituencies should be given the right to handle this.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Stephanie Perrin<mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:24 PM
To:McGrady, Paul D.<mailto:PMcGrady at winston.com> ; Volker Greimann<mailto:vgreimann at key-Systems.net> ; WUKnoben<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> ; Bladel James<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>
Cc:GNSO Council List<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

I share this concern.  This is a very important Review, covering a range of topics.  I don't see that many candidates who have expertise in all required areas, which is not surprising.  We need to make sure we have enough people, to ensure balance across a range of factors, and that the representation of interests is fair.  Seems more like 2 per SG to me.
Stephanie Perrin
On 2015-11-24 9:58, McGrady, Paul D. wrote:
Thanks Volker.  Do we have any information on how many other AC’s and SO’s are endorsing?  What I don’t want to see happen is that we put up 4 everyone else puts up dozens and we end up with 1 in the final result.  Without information on how many everyone else may endorse, I don’t see how we can be confident that our self-limitation will have its intended affect.  Do we know what everyone else is doing?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

Best,
Paul


Paul D. McGrady Jr.

Partner

Chair, Trademark, Domain Names and Brand Enforcement Practice

Winston & Strawn LLP
35 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-9703

D: +1 (312) 558-5963

F: +1 (312) 558-5700

Bio<http://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/mcgrady-paul-d.html> | VCard<http://www.winston.com/vcards/996.vcf> | Email<mailto:pmcgrady at winston.com> | winston.com<http://www.winston.com>

[Winston & Strawn LLP]


From: Volker Greimann [mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:55 AM
To: McGrady, Paul D.; WUKnoben; Bladel James
Cc: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

I think if we cast too broad a net and recommend too many candidates, the recommendation of the council will lose its punch. By focussing on a limited number of candidates, we truly endorse them.

Having one candidate from each SG makes sense as it ensures all SGs are represented.

Best,

Volker
Am 24.11.2015 um 15:44 schrieb McGrady, Paul D.:
Thanks Wolf-Ulrich.  I’d like to understand why we would limit our nominations to just one applicant per Stakeholder group for a total of 4 from the GNSO.  Are the other SOs and ACs adopting the same limitations?  Is this an ICANN requirement?  It seems to me that the GNSO will be disproportionately affected by the outcomes of the CCT Review, so unless self-limiting is required, I guess I don’t see the upside and would prefer to endorse as many candidates as possible and just have the various groups lobby one level up for their people.  Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this!

Best,
Paul


Paul D. McGrady Jr.

Partner

Chair, Trademark, Domain Names and Brand Enforcement Practice

Winston & Strawn LLP
35 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-9703

D: +1 (312) 558-5963

F: +1 (312) 558-5700

Bio<http://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/mcgrady-paul-d.html> | VCard<http://www.winston.com/vcards/996.vcf> | Email<mailto:pmcgrady at winston.com> | winston.com<http://www.winston.com>

[Winston & Strawn LLP]


From:owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:20 AM
To: Bladel James
Cc: GNSO Council List
Subject: Fw: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

Hi James,

by picking this up: could you please make reference to my email from 21 Nov with respect to the process? As time is short – and Thanksgiving is close – I wonder whether the council agrees to the process suggested.

I’ve already alerted the CSG and am confident to receive some input.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Marika Konings<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:22 AM
To: Council<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

For your information.

From: <soac-infoalert-bounces at icann.org<mailto:soac-infoalert-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Charla Shambley <charla.shambley at icann.org<mailto:charla.shambley at icann.org>>
Date: Monday 23 November 2015 20:01
To: "mailto:%27soac-infoalert at icann.org'" <soac-infoalert at icann.org<mailto:soac-infoalert at icann.org>>
Cc: Eleeza Agopian <eleeza.agopian at icann.org<mailto:eleeza.agopian at icann.org>>, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org<mailto:Margie.Milam at icann.org>>
Subject: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

Dear SO/AC leaders,

We are pleased to report that we received 72 applications from individuals interested in serving on the next review team under the Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) that will examine the impact of new gTLDS in the areas of competition, consumer trust and consumer choice (CCT).  Before final selection of the CCT Review Team is completed by the ICANN CEO and the GAC Chair,  we are seeking endorsements from any SO/AC for those applicants<https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/aoc/cct/applications> who have expressed an interest to serve as their representatives.

If you choose to endorse an applicant, please send your endorsements by email to reviews at icann.org<mailto:reviews at icann.org> by  the updated deadline of 17 December at 23:59 UTC.

In order to help with the endorsement process, below are answers to some frequently asked questions:

Is there a set allocation for SO/AC representatives?  Under the AoC, there is no set allocation per SO/AC or per stakeholder group, nor is there a maximum for total size of the review team.

How Many Members Will be on the Review Team?  There is no set number of volunteers for the Review Team.  However, keep in mind that the review team should be comprised of members that collectively have  expertise covering the wide range of topics that are within the mandate of this review team.   Past AoC review teams were comprised of approximately 16 members.

What Were the Criteria for Applicants?  The call for volunteers<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/call-volunteers-cct-rt-2015-10-01-en> lists the criteria that we were looking for.  The composition should be based on several factors, including:


<!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Subject matter expertise –

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->New gTLD application process/objections

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Intellectual Property

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Security & Malicious Abuse of the DNS

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Competition Issues

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Consumer Protection

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Public Policy Concerns

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Trust in the DNS

<!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Representation across the interested SO/ACs

<!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Diversity

<!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Regional representation

For more information, please see:  https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-11-16-en.

The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.







--


Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.





Mit freundlichen Grüßen,





Volker A. Greimann


- Rechtsabteilung -





Key-Systems GmbH


Im Oberen Werk 1


66386 St. Ingbert


Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901


Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851


Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net<mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net>





Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net> / www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.RRPproxy.net>


www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com> / www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.BrandShelter.com>





Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:


www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>


www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>





Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin


Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken


Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534





Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP


www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu>





Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.





--------------------------------------------





Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.





Best regards,





Volker A. Greimann


- legal department -





Key-Systems GmbH


Im Oberen Werk 1


66386 St. Ingbert


Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901


Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851


Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net<mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net>





Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net> / www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.RRPproxy.net>


www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com> / www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.BrandShelter.com>





Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:


www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>


www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>





CEO: Alexander Siffrin


Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken


V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534





Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP


www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu>





This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.










The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.

________________________________

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4477/11098 - Release Date: 12/01/15
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20151216/914b4d0f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4321 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20151216/914b4d0f/image001.png>


More information about the council mailing list