[council] Re: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal - CORRECTION

Thomas Rickert rickert at anwaelte.de
Mon Dec 28 10:33:49 UTC 2015


Dear James,
thank you for your messages! We take good note of the updated references.

Kind regards,
Thomas

========
rickert.net

PS - Sent from my cell. Please excuse typos and brevity.

> Am 26.12.2015 um 18:12 schrieb James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>:
> 
> CCGW-ACCT Co-Chairs
> 26 DEC 2015
> 
> Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:
> 
> Please note that my previous message included incorrect information for the positions submitted on behalf of the NCSG, NCUC and NPOC.  Those references should instead read as follows:
> 
> Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG)
> Survey Response - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html
>  
> Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Comment - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html
>  
> Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Survey Response - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html
> 
> I apologize for any confusion resulting from my error.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> James Bladel
> GNSO Chair
> 
> 
> 
> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> Date: Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 10:55 
> To: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>, Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>
> Cc: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org>, James Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
> Subject: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal
> 
> Sending on behalf of James Bladel, GNSO Chair:
> 
> CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs
> Re: GNSO Review of Third Draft Proposal
> 24 DEC 2015
> 
> 
> Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:
> 
> Earlier this week, 21 Dec 2015, marked the close of the Public Comment period covering the Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal. Unfortunately, due to the size and diversity of the organizations that comprise the GNSO, and the compressed time frame, we were unable to develop a unified GNSO response to the 12 Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability by the close of the comment period.
> 
> Listed below are links to comments and survey responses submitted on behalf of GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs).  Additional submissions were made on behalf of individuals and organizations that participate in the GNSO from within one or more SG/C.  We have formed a team tasked with analyzing these responses, and using them to draft a harmonized position for consideration by the GNSO Council in a special session convening on 14 January 2016 Presuming this position is successfully adopted, it will be transmitted to you immediately following this session.
> 
> Once again, please accept our gratitude for dedication and patience in shepherding this enormous and historic work unit over the past year.  We are very near the finish line, and look forward to further contributing our thoughts to this document, and the Final CCWG-Accountability Proposal.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> James Bladel
> GNSO Chair
> 
> 
> Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG):
> Comment - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00035.html
> Survey Response - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00034.html
> 
> Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)
> Comment - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00084.html
> 
> Intellectual Property Interests Constituency (IPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00100.html
> 
> Internet Service Providers Constituency (ISPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Survey Response - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00046.html
> 
> Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00064.html
> 
> Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Comment - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html
> Survey Response - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html
> 
> Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Survey Response - http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20151228/d11b5844/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list