[council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition

Phil Corwin psc at vlaw-dc.com
Mon Feb 23 22:59:12 UTC 2015


Members of the Business Constituency seem to be generally supportive of the sentiments contained in the draft Statement. However, I am being asked two questions in regard to it:

1.       What is the overall purpose of issuing the Statement?

2.       What is the effect of a Constituency endorsing the statement - and, in particular, does it replace the views of any constituency or SG or preclude a more nuanced and detailed future statement by them?

Once I have those answers I should be able to indicate whether the BC can support and/or be listed as a signatory.

Thanks and best regards,

PS-This paragraph of the Statement, as modified by you and James, has two typos:
"Given [it's] its co-ordination and policy management role within the GNSO, the GNSO Council remains committed to assisting the work within CWG, CCWG and the ICG in order that the community may ultimately deliver a sound, comprehensive and consensus proposal for the transition of the IANA function and one that will uphold the principles set forth in the NTIA announcement, and fully meet the needs of the global Internet community."

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 6:47 AM
To: 'David Cake'; 'Tony Holmes'; council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition

Attached in .pdf if easier to read on some devices.


From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info]
Sent: 23 February 2015 11:37
To: 'David Cake'; 'Tony Holmes'; council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition

Thanks Tony & Avri,

Please see my suggested edits contained in the attached redline version.


From: David Cake [mailto:dave at difference.com.au]
Sent: 23 February 2015 10:11
To: Tony Holmes; <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>> List
Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition

I would be happy to support that statement.


On 23 Feb 2015, at 3:39 am, Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com<mailto:tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>> wrote:

Attached is the draft statement compiled by Avri and I on the IANA transition process.
Comments welcome.

<GNSO statement on the IANA transition - draft.zip>

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4284/9131 - Release Date: 02/17/15
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20150223/092eb51f/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list