[council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

McGrady, Paul D. PMcGrady at winston.com
Tue Nov 24 15:27:05 UTC 2015


Thanks Marika.  I agree that asking for more information is fine, so long as it doesn't permanently send us down a path where each constituency has very little chance of having their unique voices heard during this important review process.  Thanks!

Best,
Paul



From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 9:14 AM
To: WUKnoben; Bladel James
Cc: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

Not having seen any objections to going back to candidates seeking GNSO endorsement to request additional information concerning the GNSO criteria identified, staff will go ahead and request this information from those candidates so that the information is available for SG/C/Council to review by the 7 December document deadline. Of course, this should not impact your discussion on the questions outlined by Wolf-Ulrich below.

Best regards,

Marika

From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Date: Tuesday 24 November 2015 04:13
To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: Fw: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

Hi James,

by picking this up: could you please make reference to my email from 21 Nov with respect to the process? As time is short - and Thanksgiving is close - I wonder whether the council agrees to the process suggested.

I've already alerted the CSG and am confident to receive some input.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Marika Konings<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:22 AM
To: Council<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

For your information.

From: <soac-infoalert-bounces at icann.org<mailto:soac-infoalert-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Charla Shambley <charla.shambley at icann.org<mailto:charla.shambley at icann.org>>
Date: Monday 23 November 2015 20:01
To: "'soac-infoalert at icann.org<mailto:'soac-infoalert at icann.org>'" <soac-infoalert at icann.org<mailto:soac-infoalert at icann.org>>
Cc: Eleeza Agopian <eleeza.agopian at icann.org<mailto:eleeza.agopian at icann.org>>, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org<mailto:Margie.Milam at icann.org>>
Subject: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

Dear SO/AC leaders,

We are pleased to report that we received 72 applications from individuals interested in serving on the next review team under the Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) that will examine the impact of new gTLDS in the areas of competition, consumer trust and consumer choice (CCT).  Before final selection of the CCT Review Team is completed by the ICANN CEO and the GAC Chair,  we are seeking endorsements from any SO/AC for those applicants<https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/aoc/cct/applications> who have expressed an interest to serve as their representatives.

If you choose to endorse an applicant, please send your endorsements by email to reviews at icann.org<mailto:reviews at icann.org> by  the updated deadline of 17 December at 23:59 UTC.

In order to help with the endorsement process, below are answers to some frequently asked questions:

Is there a set allocation for SO/AC representatives?  Under the AoC, there is no set allocation per SO/AC or per stakeholder group, nor is there a maximum for total size of the review team.

How Many Members Will be on the Review Team?  There is no set number of volunteers for the Review Team.  However, keep in mind that the review team should be comprised of members that collectively have  expertise covering the wide range of topics that are within the mandate of this review team.   Past AoC review teams were comprised of approximately 16 members.

What Were the Criteria for Applicants?  The call for volunteers<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/call-volunteers-cct-rt-2015-10-01-en> lists the criteria that we were looking for.  The composition should be based on several factors, including:


<!--[if !supportLists]-->*         <!--[endif]-->Subject matter expertise -

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->New gTLD application process/objections

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Intellectual Property

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Security & Malicious Abuse of the DNS

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Competition Issues

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Consumer Protection

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Public Policy Concerns

<!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Trust in the DNS

<!--[if !supportLists]-->*         <!--[endif]-->Representation across the interested SO/ACs

<!--[if !supportLists]-->*         <!--[endif]-->Diversity

<!--[if !supportLists]-->*         <!--[endif]-->Regional representation

For more information, please see:  https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-11-16-en.
The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20151124/ee7acdf8/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list