[council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

WUKnoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Tue Nov 24 20:13:42 UTC 2015


I understand the concerns, in particular since no limit has been preset with respect to the review team membership.

Can our liaisons – Olivier for ALAC and Patrick for ccNSO – disclose how their respective SO is dealing with the question? >From the published list of applications – maybe it’s not the most recent one - I count 9 ALAC, 3 ccNSO, 3 GAC, 27 GNSO and 31 Independent. So “dozens” could just come from the GNSO.
Limitation seems to me necessary to let the GNSO appear being credible. And we should avoid discussions between our groups about which applicant may be more appropriate in comparison to others. The SGs/constituencies should be given the right to handle this.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



From: Stephanie Perrin 
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:24 PM
To: McGrady, Paul D. ; Volker Greimann ; WUKnoben ; Bladel James 
Cc: GNSO Council List 
Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

I share this concern.  This is a very important Review, covering a range of topics.  I don't see that many candidates who have expertise in all required areas, which is not surprising.  We need to make sure we have enough people, to ensure balance across a range of factors, and that the representation of interests is fair.  Seems more like 2 per SG to me.
Stephanie Perrin


On 2015-11-24 9:58, McGrady, Paul D. wrote:

  Thanks Volker.  Do we have any information on how many other AC’s and SO’s are endorsing?  What I don’t want to see happen is that we put up 4 everyone else puts up dozens and we end up with 1 in the final result.  Without information on how many everyone else may endorse, I don’t see how we can be confident that our self-limitation will have its intended affect.  Do we know what everyone else is doing?

   

  Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

   

  Best,

  Paul

   

   

        Paul D. McGrady Jr.
       
        Partner 
       
        Chair, Trademark, Domain Names and Brand Enforcement Practice 
       
        Winston & Strawn LLP
        35 W. Wacker Drive
        Chicago, IL 60601-9703
       
        D: +1 (312) 558-5963
       
        F: +1 (312) 558-5700
       
        Bio | VCard | Email | winston.com
       



   

   

  From: Volker Greimann [mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net] 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:55 AM
  To: McGrady, Paul D.; WUKnoben; Bladel James
  Cc: GNSO Council List
  Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

   

  I think if we cast too broad a net and recommend too many candidates, the recommendation of the council will lose its punch. By focussing on a limited number of candidates, we truly endorse them. 

  Having one candidate from each SG makes sense as it ensures all SGs are represented.

  Best,

  Volker

  Am 24.11.2015 um 15:44 schrieb McGrady, Paul D.:

    Thanks Wolf-Ulrich.  I’d like to understand why we would limit our nominations to just one applicant per Stakeholder group for a total of 4 from the GNSO.  Are the other SOs and ACs adopting the same limitations?  Is this an ICANN requirement?  It seems to me that the GNSO will be disproportionately affected by the outcomes of the CCT Review, so unless self-limiting is required, I guess I don’t see the upside and would prefer to endorse as many candidates as possible and just have the various groups lobby one level up for their people.  Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this!

     

    Best,

    Paul

     

     

          Paul D. McGrady Jr.
         
          Partner 
         
          Chair, Trademark, Domain Names and Brand Enforcement Practice 
         
          Winston & Strawn LLP
          35 W. Wacker Drive
          Chicago, IL 60601-9703
         
          D: +1 (312) 558-5963
         
          F: +1 (312) 558-5700
         
          Bio | VCard | Email | winston.com
         



     

     

    From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
    Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:20 AM
    To: Bladel James
    Cc: GNSO Council List
    Subject: Fw: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

     

    Hi James,

     

    by picking this up: could you please make reference to my email from 21 Nov with respect to the process? As time is short – and Thanksgiving is close – I wonder whether the council agrees to the process suggested.

     

    I’ve already alerted the CSG and am confident to receive some input.

    Best regards

    Wolf-Ulrich

     

    From: Marika Konings 

    Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:22 AM

    To: Council 

    Subject: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

     

    For your information. 

     

    From: <soac-infoalert-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Charla Shambley <charla.shambley at icann.org>
    Date: Monday 23 November 2015 20:01
    To: "mailto:%27soac-infoalert at icann.org'" <soac-infoalert at icann.org>
    Cc: Eleeza Agopian <eleeza.agopian at icann.org>, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org>
    Subject: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER

     

    Dear SO/AC leaders,

     

    We are pleased to report that we received 72 applications from individuals interested in serving on the next review team under the Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) that will examine the impact of new gTLDS in the areas of competition, consumer trust and consumer choice (CCT).  Before final selection of the CCT Review Team is completed by the ICANN CEO and the GAC Chair,  we are seeking endorsements from any SO/AC for those applicants who have expressed an interest to serve as their representatives.  

     

    If you choose to endorse an applicant, please send your endorsements by email to reviews at icann.org by  the updated deadline of 17 December at 23:59 UTC.     

     

    In order to help with the endorsement process, below are answers to some frequently asked questions:

     

    Is there a set allocation for SO/AC representatives?  Under the AoC, there is no set allocation per SO/AC or per stakeholder group, nor is there a maximum for total size of the review team.   

     

    How Many Members Will be on the Review Team?  There is no set number of volunteers for the Review Team.  However, keep in mind that the review team should be comprised of members that collectively have  expertise covering the wide range of topics that are within the mandate of this review team.   Past AoC review teams were comprised of approximately 16 members.

     

    What Were the Criteria for Applicants?  The call for volunteers lists the criteria that we were looking for.  The composition should be based on several factors, including:

     

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Subject matter expertise – 

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->New gTLD application process/objections

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Intellectual Property 

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Security & Malicious Abuse of the DNS

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Competition Issues

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Consumer Protection

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Public Policy Concerns 

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Trust in the DNS

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Representation across the interested SO/ACs

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Diversity

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Regional representation

     

    For more information, please see:  https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-11-16-en. 


    The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. 





-- Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Volker A. Greimann- Rechtsabteilung - Key-Systems GmbHIm Oberen Werk 166386 St. IngbertTel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.netwww.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:www.facebook.com/KeySystemswww.twitter.com/key_systems Geschäftsführer: Alexander SiffrinHandelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534 Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUPwww.keydrive.lu  Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen. -------------------------------------------- Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Best regards, Volker A. Greimann- legal department - Key-Systems GmbHIm Oberen Werk 166386 St. IngbertTel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.netwww.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:www.facebook.com/KeySystemswww.twitter.com/key_systems CEO: Alexander SiffrinRegistration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534 Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUPwww.keydrive.lu  This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.   
  The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20151124/800704f1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2044 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20151124/800704f1/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2044 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20151124/800704f1/attachment-0001.jpe>


More information about the council mailing list