[council] RE: Letter from GAC regarding advice versus recommendations
James M. Bladel
jbladel at godaddy.com
Thu Oct 1 03:26:27 UTC 2015
Good question(s), Donna.
Additionally, I'd like to understand if this response indicates that the
GAC believes that the issue of mandatory PICs/Safeguards is still open for
³highly regulated² TLDs.
On 9/28/15, 15:37 , "owner-council at gnso.icann.org on behalf of Austin,
Donna" <owner-council at gnso.icann.org on behalf of
Donna.Austin at neustar.biz> wrote:
>What do you see as the consequence of the GAC's response?
>I found the letter from the Board to the GAC interesting and wondered why
>they had taken that approach. The letter from the Board to the GAC
>seeking clarification is available here:
>From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]
>On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
>Sent: Sunday, 27 September 2015 6:39 PM
>To: council at gnso.icann.org
>Subject: [council] Letter from GAC regarding advice versus recommendations
>For information, the Board asked for clarification of the terms
>recommendation and advice in the recent GAC Communiqué.
>Attached is a response from the chair of the GAC.
More information about the council