Fwd: Re: [council] RE: GNSO Review of the GAC Communique

Wed Apr 6 20:30:29 UTC 2016

Thanks to Donna for reminding me of the reply all problem, I had already 
forgotten.  Too many lists....here we go again
cheers Stephanie

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [council] RE: GNSO Review of the GAC Communique
Date: 	Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:24:19 -0400
From: 	Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
To: 	Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>, Susan Kawaguchi 
<susank at fb.com>, council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>

It is not too blunt as far as I am concerned.  I agree with Volker that 
we need to send a message on that one.  You have already given a 
significant concession by not pointing out that the comments of the 
public safety group were not sent in on time or in the usual way.
cheers Stephanie Perrin

On 2016-04-06 14:34, Austin, Donna wrote:
>
> Susan and Rubens
>
> I’ve made some changes and added a comment. While, I did use track 
> changes I’m not confident my suggested changes are easily 
> recognisable, so I’ll summarise them here for ease of reference.
>
> Future gTLD Rounds:
>
> Asthe GAC has outlined there are many ongoing reviews that address the 
> new gTLD program.
>
> The original word was PDPs and I changed this to reviews because I 
> felt this better reflected the work efforts currently underway and is 
> more consistent with the references in the GAC communique.
>
> I also asked a question for the Council in response to the text: The 
> community along with the board should make it a priority to ensure 
> that there is a logical sequence in the review and resulting policy 
> review.
>
> Is this something the GNSO should take the lead on? The RySG and RrSG 
> have raised this issue with the Board on a number of occasions. Bruce 
> Tonkin is of the view that there are two efforts that need to be 
> complete before the launch of any new gTLDs: the CCT RT and the 
> Subsequent Round PDP.
>
> I also marked up the text on underserved regions to make it more 
> specific, but I don’t believe I changed the intent:
>
> The GNSO council agrees that raising awareness of any future efforts 
> to introduce new gTLDs in the underserved regions should be an 
> important consideration. However, we would also like to note that 
> having gTLD registry operators is only one part of the problem since 
> registrants also need registrars or resellers with local language and 
> payment method support.
>
> PPSAI
>
> I added a sentence to the response on this issue which some folks may 
> think is too blunt, so I’m okay to delete if others are uncomfortable 
> with it:
>
> The Council notes that the GAC provided comments on the PPSAI Final 
> Report via the Public Safety Working Group, which were considered by 
> the Working Group. It is the hope of the Council that the GAC will not 
> use the opportunity to discuss the Final Report of the WG as an 
> opportunity to discuss new concerns.
>
> Thanks
>
> Donna
>
> *Donna Austin**:****Neustar, Inc.**
> *Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
>
> *Cell:***+1.310.890.9655 *Email: *donna.austin at neustar.biz 
> <mailto:donna.austin at neustar.biz>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for 
> the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential 
> and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient 
> you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, 
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
> notify me immediately and delete the original message.
>
> *Follow Neustar:*cid:image001.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0Facebook 
> <http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc>cid:image002.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0LinkedIn 
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349>cid:image003.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0Twitter 
> <http://www.twitter.com/neustar>
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
> *From:*owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Kawaguchi
> *Sent:* Monday, 4 April 2016 3:43 PM
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
> *Subject:* [council] GNSO Review of the GAC Communique
>
> Hello All,
>
> Please see the attached review of the GAC Communique and the motion 
> for consideration at the April Council meeting.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Susan Kawaguchi
>
> Domain Name Manager
>
> Facebook Legal Dept.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160406/b0ca0570/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 792 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160406/b0ca0570/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160406/b0ca0570/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 586 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160406/b0ca0570/attachment-0002.png>