[council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO Review WP Analysis

[Marika Konings]

Wolf-Ulrich, Amr, all,

I¹ve made some updates to the letter which aim to capture your input (see
attached). Please suggest alternative language if this does not correctly
capture the points made.

Best regards,

Marika 

From:  "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
Date:  Thursday 21 April 2016 at 07:02
To:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Marika Konings
<marika.konings at icann.org>, GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO
Review WP Analysis

Hi Wolf-Ulrich.


1. Shouldn¹t the letter be addressed to the OEC chair?
‹ Good catch, I agree.

2. Do we expect action/approval from the OEC or board re starting the
implementation planning? Then we should express it.
‹ Yes, we should establish this expectation

Thanks‹

J.




From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of WUKnoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 5:54
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, GNSO Council List
<council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO
Review WP Analysis

Thanks Marika,
 
1. Shouldn¹t the letter be addressed to the OEC chair?
 
2. Do we expect action/approval from the OEC or board re starting the
implementation planning? Then we should express it.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 
From: Marika Konings <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:45 AM
To: GNSO Council List <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO Review
WP Analysis
 
Dear All,
 
Please find attached for your review, the proposed transmittal letter to the
Board¹s Organisational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) concerning the adoption
by the GNSO Council of the GNSO Review Working Party¹s Feasibility and
Prioritisation Analysis of the GNSO Review recommendations. As you will
note, placeholder language has been included to accommodate any additional
comments GNSO Council members may want to include concerning the feasibility
and priority of the GNSO Review recommendations, as discussed during the
Council meeting. 
 
If you want to add any comments in relation to the feasibility and
prioritisation of the recommendations, please provide those at the latest by
Friday 22 April. As noted during the Council meeting as well as pointed out
in the draft letter, the next phase of work will focus on the development of
the implementation plan so any comments related to that aspect of the
process should be reserved for the next phase.
 
Thanks,
 
Marika


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160421/f8ef90e6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Transmittal letter - GNSO Review WP analysis - updated 21 April 2016.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 994064 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160421/f8ef90e6/Transmittalletter-GNSOReviewWPanalysis-updated21April2016.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4599 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160421/f8ef90e6/smime.p7s>