[council] FOR YOUR INFORMATION: Update from Chris Disspain on the IGO protections issue

Johan Helsingius julf at julf.com
Mon Aug 22 09:18:03 UTC 2016


In the note from Chris Disspain, he on one hand states
"As we noted in Helsinki, this would be the appropriate next
step since the GNSO is responsible for gTLD policy development",
so he acknowledges that the GNSO is indeed responsible for gTLD
policy development, but then continues with "The outcome of the
GNSO’s deliberations will then be considered by the Board in its
determination of whether it will accept the GNSO’s recommendations
as consistent with GAC advice or not."

So what happens (procedurally) if the Board does not accept the
GNSO recommendations as "consistent with GAC advice"?

	Julf





More information about the council mailing list