[gnso-secs] Re: [council] Proposed Agenda GNSO Council Meeting 1 December 2016 at 21:00UTC

Thu Dec 1 19:41:34 UTC 2016

Dear Julf and all,

The AC room link is: https://participate.icann.org/gnsocouncil

Kind regards,

Nathalie

u=https-3A__participate.icann.org_gnsocouncil&d=DQMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=1zLKnja_XkZwjihxDWH1MSFL4lQBvJ5nUHcUxB9PgD4&s=drOarVLK9EKKtne_cFryFrmdiu2p8GiZSbI4uVdyS9o&e=>

On 12/1/16, 8:19 PM, "owner-gnso-secs at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-secs at icann.org> on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <owner-gnso-secs at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-secs at icann.org> on behalf of julf at julf.com<mailto:julf at julf.com>> wrote:

What adobe connect link should we use?

Julf

On 01-12-16 08:23, Nathalie Peregrine wrote:
Dear All,

Please find the updated proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on
1 December 2016 at 21:00 UTC. Links will be provided for Item 5 when
available.
Please note that *all documents *referenced *in the agenda have been
gathered on a Wiki page for convenience and easier
access:* https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_l5LDAw-5Bcommunity.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=B6K07jrdjrL07XZiUu7orMyTjBvtp6AZq5vbShAKMLI&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_l5LDAw&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=djndonGNmPB9XCz2YEo57E3RP7MHwylV59HZzjjUgUk&e=>
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Operating Procedures
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_op-2Dprocedures-2D01sep16-2Den.pdf&d=DQMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=55oYi9y1UeIL5juaxAkqpioz33PyWq> v3.2,
updated on 01 September 2016.
For convenience:
   * An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is
     provided in _Appendix 1_ at the end of this agenda.
   * An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the
     absentee voting procedures is provided in _Appendix 2_ at the end of
     this agenda.
Coordinated Universal Time: 21:00 UTC
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tinyurl.com_zqkas4h-5Btinyurl.com-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=dT9mzSp2rk47k5Da2TYfi3hYVHC6_PTa3tLFHKuRe9M&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tinyurl.com_zqkas4h&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=GQrrb-5wfVwExPeuYPyTdP-lCTA795_FUFaUNe77cYs&e=>**
*
*13:00 Los Angeles; 16:00 Washington; 21:00 London; (Friday 2^nd
  December) 00:00 Istanbul; 08:00 Hobart
*___________________________________*
*Item 1. Administrative Matters (5 mins)*
1.1 - Roll Call
1.2 - Updates to Statements of Interest
1.3 - Review / Amend Agenda
1.4 - Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meetings per
the GNSO Operating Procedures:
Minutes of the meeting of the GNSO Council on 7 November 2016 and posted
on XXXXXXX 2016.

*Item 2. Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (5 mins)*
2.1 - Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes /
topics, to include review of Projects List [gnso.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_project&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=kBZ003hIhGjPzEdgi-PFtncJOOcmeqCM1PbKkUgsVz0&e=>and Action
Item List[community.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_RgZlAg&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=viVDWlTD9pBSbRA0Ca9MrDY09WT9NdhpdDGZvRmdL5A&e=>

*Item 3. Consent Agenda (0 mins)*
* *
*Item 4. COUNCIL VOTE – Adoption of Consensus Recommendations from the
GNSO Bylaws Drafting Team (10 minutes)*
On 30 June 2016, the GNSO Council created a Drafting Team (DT) to work
with ICANN staff to identify the GNSO’s new rights and obligations under
the revised ICANN Bylaws, and prepare an implementation plan to address
any needed changes by 30 September
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_resolutions-2320160630-2D2-29-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=oCqX2l-oCaJOyZO2-8ZxWc21z_bwvinET1pfLuLtQqg&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_resolutions-2320160630-2D2-2529&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=nlpNf0f4WasXPnr1kqv8mJsHTDYbhmHr_L1TGrWRFcg&e=>.
On 29 September 2016, the Council received an update on the status of
the DT’s work and, pending the completion of the DT’s work, the Council
voted to appoint the GNSO Chair as its interim representative to the
Empowered Community (EC) Administration. At its meeting on 13 October,
the Council reviewed the DT’s report and recommendations (Final
Report: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_bylaws-2Ddrafting-2Dteam-2Dfinal-2Dreport-2D12oct16-2Den.pdf-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=NpP630sgQZSbSKoVrKI4IBMPsKtwNJEh5ndTE6y5WQw&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_bylaws-2Ddrafting-2Dteam-2Dfinal-2Dreport-2D12oct16-2Den.pdf&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=dLiArWhrBsDH0mNsmfMBx8uVcWdDdXRQ-M4x0nabfmU&e=>;
Minority
Statement: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_bylaws-2Ddrafting-2Dteam-2Dminority-2Dreport-2D10oct16-2Den.pdf-29-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=jDemsZbQ9a-dfTsulKK_AfkyPKNGfTQ1uSqf94dXzDE&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_bylaws-2Ddrafting-2Dteam-2Dminority-2Dreport-2D10oct16-2Den.pdf-29&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=suPjvX8K-WP7q2gBcepEOIr65RdoU3dVx1qAKoW00AU&e=>.
At ICANN57, the Council agreed to amend the original motion that had
been submitted for Council consideration.
Here the Council will vote on whether or not to pass the amended motion.
Following the passage of a final motion, the GNSO is expected to confirm
its process for appointing its EC representative going forward.
4.1 – Presentation of the motion[community.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsocouncilmeetings_Motions-26-2343-3B1-26-2343-3BDecember-26-2343-3B2016&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=0kK5l26dGz6hzECC6KdEKVRFat-Dr99n1u8u2CEimS8&e=> (James
Bladel)
4.2 – Council discussion
4.3 – Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority)
* *
*Item 5. COUNCIL VOTE – GNSO Council Response to the Board on gTLD
Policy Matters related to the GAC Communique from Hyderabad (20 minutes)*
Beginning in July 2015, the GNSO Council has reviewed each GAC
Communiqué for issues relating to gTLD policy, with a view toward
providing feedback to the ICANN Board as well as the broader community
concerning past, present or future GNSO policy activities concerning
advice provided by the GAC. In the GAC Communique from ICANN57 in
Hyderabad, the GAC had provided specific advice regarding protections in
the domain name system for International Governmental Organization (IGO)
names and acronyms as well as identifiers associated with the
international Red Cross movement and its National Societies
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_correspondence_gac-2Dto-2Dicann-2D08nov16-2Den.pdf-29-5Bicann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=sjdqFuuOSkFsXoEwJwS3xKQEcZv6SZc1cT0mI145DnA&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_correspondence_gac-2Dto-2Dicann-2D08nov16-2Den.pdf-29&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=mFzheCtf9IBwsuYUAtgU96EyKBKNVArCndR3Ok2ppVE&e=>.
Also at ICANN57, the ICANN Board had suggested that a facilitated
discussion between the GAC and the GNSO on remaining inconsistencies
between GAC advice and GNSO policy recommendations on these matters be
considered as a possible path forward
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_icann572016_60_I57-2520HYD-5FTue08Nov2016-2DPublic-2520Forum-25202-2Den.pdf-29-5Bschd.ws-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=n-1k_p4gbZqUXb6EXeJFDg5NZHjzUgMU-8sBN7Pm4D0&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_icann572016_60_I57-2520HYD-5FTue08Nov2016-2DPublic-2520Forum-25202-2Den.pdf-29&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=gZAtGNidxQ7zKOxlxeBcxRX1fkdx79cD7BP37JWkX6o&e=>.
A draft response [INSERT LINK] to the GAC’s Communique from ICANN57 in
Hyderabad was circulated to the GNSO Council on [INSERT DATE]. Here the
Council will consider whether or not to approve a response to the Board,
and confirm its intended next steps with regard to reconciling its
policy recommendations with GAC advice on the topic of Red Cross and IGO
protections.
5.1 – Presentation of the motion[community.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsocouncilmeetings_Motions-26-2343-3B1-26-2343-3BDecember-26-2343-3B2016&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=0kK5l26dGz6hzECC6KdEKVRFat-Dr99n1u8u2CEimS8&e=> (Paul
McGrady)
5.2 – Council discussion
5.3 – Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority)

*Item 6: *(may be removed from agenda pending decision on sending
letter) *COUNCIL VOTE – Approval of Letter to the ICANN Board concerning
Implementation Issues with Part C of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy
(10 minutes)*
Part C of ICANN’s Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP), aimed at
combatting domain name theft, is scheduled to come into effect on 1
December 2016
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_transfer-2Dpolicy-2D2016-2D06-2D01-2Den-29-5Bicann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=jDsyK1GLlevj2lNPJ6Leekh0vlehyPcESBLgUEf0dWQ&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_transfer-2Dpolicy-2D2016-2D06-2D01-2Den-29&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=0CI4SN9VTlI4coanEdMPFs4jfj7-eSRVaSm2Gkfd0no&e=>.
On 31 October 2016, the Registrar Stakeholder Group identified and
raised a critical issue concerning the implementation of IRTP Part C in
relation to the provision of privacy and proxy services
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_mailing-2Dlists_archives_council_msg19339.html-29-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=Zh5QKlU6MyWyNqywXrcUxeAvcUl7qqWIuatrP7qsBc8&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_mailing-2Dlists_archives_council_msg19339.html-29&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=3nI-aswx9lbyAP35FYEs6-KNKBZvr2yFspqBKuTnriA&e=>.
At ICANN57 in Hyderabad, the GNSO Council discussed the issue with
ICANN’s Global Domains Division staff in charge of policy
implementation, and it was suggested that the most appropriate course of
action would be to to request that the ICANN Board direct staff to
remove the privacy/proxy services aspect from the IRTP and place it for
evaluation and recommendation by the newly formed Privacy Proxy Services
Accreditation Issues Implementation Review Team.
A draft letter to the Board was circulated to the Council on 21 November.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_correspondence_gnso-2Dcouncil-2Dto-2Dicann-2Dboard-2D21nov16-2Den.pdf-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=8a6TEVrz9i1ahVO9-meGLLIZtJ13pHPcbCaScfdzCiU&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_correspondence_gnso-2Dcouncil-2Dto-2Dicann-2Dboard-2D21nov16-2Den.pdf&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=UfhJM16l04kGffwoyLGta1ejPDXeldiJ5GPZzuxrNC0&e=>
Here the Council will discuss whether or not to approve the letter for
transmission to the ICANN Board.
6.1 – Presentation of the motion[community.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsocouncilmeetings_Motions-26-2343-3B1-26-2343-3BDecember-26-2343-3B2016&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=0kK5l26dGz6hzECC6KdEKVRFat-Dr99n1u8u2CEimS8&e=> (Darcy
Southwell)
6.2 – Council discussion
6.3 – Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority)

*Item 7. COUNCIL VOTE – Adoption of Proposed Implementation Plan for
Recommendations relating to the 2014 GNSO Review (10 minutes)*
Along with the ICANN Board’s adoption in June 2016 of certain
recommendations from the 2014 GNSO Review, the GNSO Council requested
that ICANN policy staff prepare a discussion paper outlining the
possible options for implementation, taking into account past
implementation of previous GNSO Reviews as well as existing mechanisms.
At ICANN56 in Helsinki in June 2016, the GNSO Council discussed the
options outlined in the staff discussion paper
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_review-2Dimplementation-2Drecommendations-2Ddiscussion-2Dpaper-2D20jun16-2Den.pdf-29-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=2AE13uetE6o8WFUohQnAHuWnUiIZTR4Bj25lZ3xmr9Y&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_review-2Dimplementation-2Drecommendations-2Ddiscussion-2Dpaper-2D20jun16-2Den.pdf-29&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=-BQXfybyFmWWf2VaEaCnu_icX4XAK5qlPMNgS5XqYwQ&e=>.
On 21 July 2016 the GNSO Council chartered[gnso.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_gnso-2Dreview-2Dcharter-2D21jul16-2Den.pdf&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=mpNCVIYX665jhJ17rntBgHS9zzHgGGig8huBDIrwa2Y&e=> the
GNSO Review Working Group and directed it to submit a proposed
implementation plan to the Council for approval by the ICANN57 meeting.

The GNSO Review Working Group circulated its proposed implementation
plan to the Council on 21 November.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_review-2Dimplementation-2Drecommendations-2Dplan-2D21nov16-2Den.pdf-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=saTODfObYdFfyulCqwyxeDNcj8q-kLVhUQA4T5v9H0w&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_review-2Dimplementation-2Drecommendations-2Dplan-2D21nov16-2Den.pdf&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=Fm1pKTEN6VRmMYjEm2YXhbMroDrX19hx2uiqPqHAex8&s=Oo1S2OT2brknp3ieQ19DSDPuoVP3Cl8PZoSkWpdVYGw&e=>
Here the Council will consider whether or not to approve the plan for
transmission to the ICANN Board.
7.1 –  Presentation of the motion[community.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsocouncilmeetings_Motions-26-2343-3B1-26-2343-3BDecember-26-2343-3B2016&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=0kK5l26dGz6hzECC6KdEKVRFat-Dr99n1u8u2CEimS8&e=> (Wolf-Ulrich
Knoben)
7.2 – Council discussion
7.3 – Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority)
* *
*Item 8. COUNCIL DISCUSSION – GNSO Council Response to Proposed Scope of
the Forthcoming Registration Directory Services (RDS) Review (formerly
the Whois Review) (10 minutes)*
On 4 November 2016 ICANN staff circulated a document to all Supporting
Organizations and Advisory Committee (SO/AC) leaders that described a
proposed limited scope for the forthcoming RDS (formerly Whois)
Review https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_mailing-2Dlists_archives_council_msg19381.html-29-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=M-FgI6BXF0yMrH1sL_EgBQG7I3iCVwdqxRThd6n-9mM&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_mailing-2Dlists_archives_council_msg19381.html-29&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=ntM0ZZdwVBRVtw1bclE23GgsWtwLZIF4GEISrT6LAO0&e=>.
This topic was also discussed as part of a High Interest Topics Session
at ICANN57 in Hyderabad, and certain concerns with the proposal noted by
the GNSO Council during its Wrap Up Session. Here the Council will
discuss and confirm its feedback (if any) concerning the proposed
limited scope of the RDS Review.
8.1 – Summary and update (James Bladel / Susan Kawaguchi)
8.2 – Council discussion
8.3 – Next steps
* *
*Item 9. COUNCIL DISCUSSION – GNSO Council Response to Questions from
the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs concerning Work Stream 2 (10 minutes)*
*On 4 November 2016, the co-chairs of the Cross Community Working Group
on ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) wrote to all SO/AC leaders
seeking input by early December on the r*esources and documents used by
each SO/AC to maintain accountability to its respective designated
community, taking into account the particular or specific working
modalities of each SO/AC (and any subgroups)
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_mailing-2Dlists_archives_council_msg19440.html-29-5Bgnso.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=001sUlPdp_I7q0bduysrIUwWXv-CuIgLVi9H7vkStfA&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_mailing-2Dlists_archives_council_msg19440.html-29&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=p0RyYW1li1be3pwfT0IEnfsYU4cpZmoDk4Tz8sYIPTw&e=>.
The GNSO Council leadership is working on a possible response from the
Council, and has requested feedback from each Stakeholder Group and
Constituency on the topic. Here the Council will discuss whether or not
to send a response to the CCWG-Accountability co-chairs.
9.1 – Status summary (GNSO Council leadership)
9.2 – Council discussion
9.3 – Next steps
* ***
*Item 10: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Selection of GNSO Representatives to the
Security, Stability & Resiliency Review Team (10 minutes)*
At ICANN57 in Hyderabad, SO/AC leaders (including the chairs of several
GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies) met with ICANN staff to
discuss the selection process for appointments to the forthcoming
Security, Stability & Resiliency (SSR) Review Team. It was agreed that
selection of the final slate of Review Team members should be a
collective effort by all SO/AC leaders, and that each SO/AC would
develop its own internal guidelines for selecting its representatives
for consideration (up to a maximum of 3 per SO/AC). The group also
discussed how independent experts should be appointed to the Review
Team. The current slate of applicants can be viewed
at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_xRqsAw-5Bcommunity.icann.org-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=pl2AjoFdrLLYTH5WKd7VLc-AEeidbjDXCv9UKyP3RTo&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_xRqsAw&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=YX94XSbkxuASK4IIXMQh6w587gSVqXzudayzpkt8YE4&e=>.
Here the Council will discuss the GNSO’s selection process, with a view
toward developing a standard mechanism for all future Review Teams.
*10.1 – Status summary (James Bladel)***
*10.2 – Council discussion***
*10.3 – Next steps***
* *
*Item 11: **COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Planning for ICANN58 (10 minutes)*
At its Wrap Up Session at ICANN57 in Hyderabad, the Council discussed
the need to start planning early for ICANN58. It also agreed that
confirming certain sessions (including joint meetings with other SO/ACs
and the ICANN Board) as fixed in the overall meeting schedule would be
helpful for scheduling purposes, as would facilitating better
coordination between and with individual Stakeholder Groups and
Constituencies, and ensuring that sufficient time is given over to
policy development work. Here the Council will discuss initial
suggestions for the ICANN58 meeting schedule and consider next
steps. GNSO Council input on ICANN58 Council Planning
Survey: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_icann58-2Dcouncil-2Dplanning-2Dsurvey-2D30nov16-2Den.pdf&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=7UqwFp8ay_Jg8f5SdPbMz4HX08yPeyCRgMPrr_zbkSA&e=
*11.1 – Status summary (GNSO Council leadership)***
*11.2 – Council discussion***
*11.3 – Next steps***
* *
*Item 12: ANY OTHER BUSINESS (5 minutes)*
*12.1 – Confirmation of GNSO Council meeting **calendar[gnso.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_mailing-2Dlists_archives_council_msg19445.html&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=_FpjCoJvauMgPfK0-9y4Ksup6VnkAzgaMDt1cWmclUQ&e=>** for
2017***
* *
*Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X,
Section 3)*
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the
GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council
motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each
House. The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the
following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as
described in Annex A[icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org_en_about_governance_bylaws-23AnnexA&d=DQMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=55oYi9y1UeIL5juaxAkqpioz33PyWqjoetRz4HfuZU0&s=6qYeakEV77hP5ukN3QtuJnVBlWJAK4tFqiH0uErMfvE&e=>):
requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House
or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter
approved under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment
to the Charter through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a
Final Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant
cause, upon a motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor
of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires
an affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires
that one GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4
Stakeholder Groups supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain
Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a
two-thirds vote of the council" demonstrates the presence of a
consensus, the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or
exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval
by the ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or
amended by the GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the
Council members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House
and a majority of the other House."
* *
*Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (**GNSO Operating Procedures
4.4*[gnso.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_council_gnso-2Doperating-2Dprocedures-2D22sep11-2Den.pdf&d=DQMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=55oYi9y1UeIL5juaxAkqpioz33PyWqjoetRz4HfuZU0&s=jAo-z5qhcfq-MJtldm4uEeMDsiYMIiA06sgcu-FMbr8&e=>*)*
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN
Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the
announced time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's
adjournment. In exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the
vote, the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7
calendar days, provided such amendment is verbally confirmed by all
Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate
absentee votes according to these procedures and will provide reasonable
means for transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could
include voting by telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other
technologies as may become available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There
must be a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) 21:00 UTC
Local time between October and March Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA (_PDT) _UTC-8 +0DST 13:00
San José, Costa Rica UTC--6 +0DST 15:00
Iowa City, USA (CDT
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__fr.wikipedia.org_wiki_UTC-25E2-2588-259206-3A00&d=DQMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=55oYi9y1UeIL5juaxAkqpioz33PyWqjoetRz4HfuZU0&s=lpAnNGMFiP39IIgLn917cyE6YPY12DFo3Xq8yCt3U6E&e=>)
UTC--6 +0DST 15:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5 +0DST 16:00
Buenos Aires, Argentina (_ART_) UTC-3+0DST 18:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-2 +0DST 17:00
London, United Kingdom (GMT) UTC+0DST 21:00
Bonn, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 22:00
Cairo, Egypt, (EET) UTC+2 +0DST 23:00
Istanbul, Turkey (TRT) UTC+3+0DST 00:00 (2^nd  December 2016)
Singapore (SGT) UTC +8 +0DST 05:00 (2^nd  December 2016)
Tokyo, Japan (JST) UTC+9+0DST 06:00 (2^nd  December 2016)
Sydney/Hobart, Australia (AEDT) UTC+11+0DST 08:00 (2^ND  December 2016)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DST starts/ends on last Sunday of March 2017, 2:00 or 3:00 local time
(with exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.timeanddate.com-5Btimeanddate.com-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=szeV80KjyV0D480jp0X6PYO2E8SvUZVzS1D5B9VpJjM&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.timeanddate.com&d=DQMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=tCBSvLOuNpTkJ9SsdRLACXivZ-3cGt_UI8J6Vgmi7AU&s=Pi6sQfC8Whv0u4vxYv08Ac0jaJMZBTzgmpxb4_387WA&e=>_
_https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tinyurl.com_zqkas4h-5Btinyurl.com-5D&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=dT9mzSp2rk47k5Da2TYfi3hYVHC6_PTa3tLFHKuRe9M&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tinyurl.com_zqkas4h&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=U4IBJYYYko8geLjSlTyOXbvtmoVER-_lK-PAQ64rKHs&m=-y8r7d6ely2-auB71o09HkFgPZ8rQYMg1u-6Fisv8RY&s=GQrrb-5wfVwExPeuYPyTdP-lCTA795_FUFaUNe77cYs&e=>
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you very much
Kind regards,

Nathalie
--
Nathalie Peregrine
Specialist, SOAC Support (GNSO)
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>  <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org> >
Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
<learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=g576YedYzc92OjZY_0m0JNUmM8VEsA2PBwd2af9aPVQ&s=wKYcy38VhdGKq_vHTCRZwHyQLRIv1wU2KCOUq6OzlC0&e= >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20161201/c24dcf67/attachment.html>