[council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report

[Johan Helsingius]

Hi, James, and thank you for the clarifications!

> On each issue, the Council will consider the question of whether or not
> the harmonized statement reflects the consolidated position of the GNSO,
> including any conditions or unmet concerns expressed in SG/C comments.  It
> will be a yes(Support) or no(Object) vote, with any abstentions having the
> effect of 'Support'.

And in case of lack of majority support, it will be 'limited support'?

> One point on which we have been consistent is that the GNSO response is
> limited to only the CCWG Third Draft, and is not responding to comments
> filed by the Board or other groups.  This is essential to allow the CCWG
> to proceed on any next (final?) draft and its work on WS2.

So we are assuming one more round of comments?

> Hope this is helpful!

Very much so, thanks!

	Julf