[council] Re: Action items from GNSO Council call on 17 January regarding the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

Mary Wong mary.wong at icann.org
Thu Jan 14 15:18:00 UTC 2016


Hi Paul and everyone,

The staff understanding was that what was, and is to be, included in the final document that lays out the Council’s response will basically be those SG/C comments that are considered to be most salient to the specific point being made (e.g. a GNSO condition). We therefore assumed that any additions of specific SG/C comments at this point would first go through a review process with James and possibly the Sub Team (as they were the ones that compiled the extract of SG/C comments). Thanks for the opportunity to clarify that none of these is either a staff position or view on what ought or ought not to be included or added to the document!

Thanks and cheers
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong at icann.org
Telephone: +1-603-5744889


From:  "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at winston.com<mailto:PMcGrady at winston.com>>
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 22:20
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>, "council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>" <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: RE: Action items from GNSO Council call on 17 January regarding the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

Thanks Mary.  Just a quick question on Rec 9.  Why would there need to be a review of whether or not to include the IPC comments?  Everyone else’s comments were included, so I don’t know why the IPCs would be subject to a review to see if they would be included.  Thanks for your thoughts.

Best,
Paul



From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 8:17 AM
To: council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] Action items from GNSO Council call on 17 January regarding the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

Dear all,

Here are the notes that staff took in relation to action items stemming from the Special GNSO Council meeting that just concluded. Please let us know if we have missed or mischaracterized anything.

ACTION ITEMS:

  *   Letter explaining GNSO Council response - James to prepare draft for Council consideration before 21 January, assisted by Keith and Ed
  *   Rec 5, 11 - James to draft additional language along the lines of what was discussed/agreed on the call, assisted by Ed and Paul
  *   Rec 1 - reinsert BC note about strong right of inspection (perhaps with cross-reference in/to Rec 3?)
  *   Rec 2 - change "unanimous support" to "broad support"
  *   Rec 3, 4 - no change
  *   Rec 6 - remove last sentence; add note that certain questions remain to be resolved in WS2
  *   Rec 7 - no change
  *   Rec 8 – further elaboration needed on note about timeliness (including replies and deadlines)
  *   Rec 9 - Review whether IPC comment on AOC section 8(b) and direct constituency participation in review teams should be included; review generally for accuracy
  *   Rec 10 - emphasize need for it to be a community-led effort
  *   Rec 12 - no change
Staff will follow up with James and the various Council volunteers to ensure that you have the updates as soon as practicable.

Thanks and cheers
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
Telephone: +1-603-5744889


The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160114/bdf89f73/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list