[council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates

[Julie Hedlund]

I’ll look at this and send a corrected version.

 

Thanks!

Julie

 

From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Date: Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 5:20 AM
To: David Cake <davecake at gmail.com>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
Cc: "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates

 

You’re definitely right David. Either the scale should be 1 to 5 or the bars’ length doubled.


Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: David Cake 

Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 9:59 AM

To: Glen de Saint Géry 

Cc: mailto:council at gnso.icann.org 

Subject: Re: [council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates

 

 

On 20 Jul 2016, at 6:29 PM, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org> wrote:

and the GNSO CSC Liaison Evaluation has been published at:

http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-csc-liaison-evaluation-16jul16-en.pdf

on page:

http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/drafts

 

There is an issue with the graphics on that page. If the scores out of 10 that  the selection committee gave to James on the criteria for the position seem low, that is because they were actually scores out of 5.

 

David

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160721/713b38fd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160721/713b38fd/smime.p7s>