[council] LAST CALL - latest version of GNSO Review of GAC Communique

[Mary Wong]

Dear Councilors,

Please submit any other comments you may have on the revised draft GNSO Response to the GAC Helsinki Communique by close of business (COB) in your time zone today, Wednesday 27 July 2016. The latest version is dated 23 July (as circulated by Marika with Carlos’ edits). I’ve reattached it for your convenience.

As you’ll recall, the Council will vote on this item by electronic ballot starting on 6 August, with the voting period running for 4 calendar days thereafter (till 9 August). Please see Glen’s recent note to you about confirming your email availability for this period. Note that there will also be another motion up for voting, on confirming the final slate of CSC members and liaisons.

Thanks and cheers
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong at icann.org
Telephone: +1-603-5744889



On 7/23/16, 12:27, "owner-council at gnso.icann.org on behalf of Marika Konings" <owner-council at gnso.icann.org on behalf of marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:

    Dear All,
    
    To facilitate your review, I’ve incorporated Carlos’s proposed edits in redline format in the attached version. 
    
    Carlos, please note that I made some minor editorial changes while doing so (changed ‘rounds’ to ‘procedures’ in the first sentence, and used the complete reference for the Health Index in response (1)(I)(b)). 
    
    Please share any further comments and/or edits you may have by Wednesday 27 July at the latest.
    
    Best regards,
    
    Marika
    
    On 22/07/16 15:11, "Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <crg at isoc-cr.org> wrote:
    
        Thank you for  the extra time. Some comments on the new text.
        
        Additionally, listening to the feedback call between the GAC and Board 
        shows that there is still a lot to do ( maybe in the GAC-GNSO 
        coordination group) to clarify the relations between the GAC-BOARD-GNSO, 
          particularly of the role of individual GAC members participation in 
        PDPs, as some Councillors have suggested.
        
        In the case of the AoC Review Teams, it is my understanding that the GAC 
        member elected to the Team is a full GAC rep, or not?
        
        Wish you all a nice weekend
        
        Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
        +506 8837 7176
        Skype: carlos.raulg
        Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
        On 21 Jul 2016, at 17:20, Marika Konings wrote:
        
        > Dear All,
        >
        > As discussed during today’s meeting, please find attached the latest 
        > version of the GNSO Review of the GAC Communique. On page 7 you will 
        > find the addition suggested by James in bold. Please review this 
        > document and share any comments and/or edits you may have by Wednesday 
        > 27 July at the latest.
        >
        > Thanks,
        >
        > Marika
        >
        > Marika Konings
        > Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet 
        > Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
        > Email: marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>
        >
        > Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
        > Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive 
        > courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO 
        > Newcomer 
        > pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>.
        
    
    

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Review of GAC Communique - Helsinki - updated 23 July 2016.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 34182 bytes
Desc: GNSO Review of GAC Communique - Helsinki - updated 23 July 2016.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160727/b1a90903/GNSOReviewofGACCommunique-Helsinki-updated23July2016.docx>