[council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment

WUKnoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Wed Jun 29 09:07:21 UTC 2016

I’m not sure why there is uncertainty.

This motion is related to the GNSO future. NCAs – as members of the council – are part of the GNSO. They should undoubtedly given the opportunity to take part in this effort – either being appointed themselves or appoint others.

Best regards


From: Johan Helsingius 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:12 AM
To: council at gnso.icann.org 
Subject: Re: [council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment

> As I see it, only the houseless NCA falls into this category

Not sure - a house is, as I see it, neither a constituency or a stakeholder group,
as the whole concept of "houses" is, at least the way I see it, basically just a
voting construct. But, again, I could be very wrong. And anyway, my spell
checker keeps insisting "houseless" should be spelled "horseless".

> but I assume any SG or C could nominate someone of their choosing
> (not necessarily someone from within the SG/C).

I guess so, yes - but (and now we are really getting into minor details, but...)
can a NCA nominate anyone?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160629/6e56ba0d/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list